To compare the effectiveness and safety of two formulations of prostaglandin (PG) E2 (gel and pessary) for induction of labor. Primary outcomes were cervical ripening, initiation/duration of labor, and type of delivery.
D'Aniello, G., Bocchi, C., Florio, P., Ignacchiti, E., Guidoni, C.G., Centini, G., et al. (2003). Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary. THE JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 14(3), 158-162 [10.1080/jmf.14.3.158.162].
Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary
BOCCHI, C.;FLORIO, P.;IGNACCHITI, E.;GUIDONI, C. G.;CENTINI, G.;CITO, G.;PICCIOLINI, E.;SEVERI, F. M.;
2003-01-01
Abstract
To compare the effectiveness and safety of two formulations of prostaglandin (PG) E2 (gel and pessary) for induction of labor. Primary outcomes were cervical ripening, initiation/duration of labor, and type of delivery.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento:
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/3741
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo