Human beings today face an unfinished revolution, which keeps them bound in a Post-Human paradigm that exalts Techne and obscures Anthropos, exposing the subject to new forms of dehumanisation. Hence the challenge launched by Morin and relaunched by Cambi and Pinto Minerva, of a bet-of-resistance in order to avoid the drift of human beings and their constitutive qualities: self-determination, freedom, reflexivity and self-awareness, which form the basis of the Subject-Individual-Person who has produced technology but also holds the tools to investigate it. This leads to the need for pedagogy – as knowledge and practice – to resignify humanitas, starting from schools and their educational practices, in order to govern change through a renewed phronesis for the onlife era: a new type of knowledge and critical judgement capable of guiding actions and contributing to the human education of the human being, integrating ethics, responsibility and critical thinking.
L’essere umano affronta oggi una rivoluzione incompiuta, la quale lo tiene imbrigliato in un paradigma del Post-Umano che esalta la Techne e oscura l’Anthropos, esponendo il soggetto a nuove forme di disumanizzazione. Da qui la sfida lanciata da Morin e rilanciata da Cambi e Pinto Minerva, di una scommessa-di-resistenza al fine di evitare la deriva dell’essere umano e delle sue qualità costitutive: autodeterminazione, libertà, riflessività e autocoscienza, fondanti quel Soggetto-Individuo-Persona che sì ha prodotto la tecnica, ma possiede anche gli strumenti per metterla sotto indagine. Ne consegue la necessità della pedagogia – come sapere e prassi – di ri-significare l’humanitas a partire dalla scuola e dalle sue pratiche educativo-didattiche, per governare il cambiamento mediante una rinnovata phronesis per l’epoca onlife: un nuovo tipo di conoscenza e giudizio critico capace di guidare le azioni e contribuire a quella formazione umana dell’uomo, integrando etica, responsabilità e pensiero critico.
Carletti, C., Lavanga, F. (2026). Tra etica e humanitas nell’orizzonte di una nuova phronesis nell’epoca onlife. PEDAGOGIA E VITA, 84(1), 34-42.
Tra etica e humanitas nell’orizzonte di una nuova phronesis nell’epoca onlife
Chiara Carletti
;Francesco Lavanga
2026-01-01
Abstract
Human beings today face an unfinished revolution, which keeps them bound in a Post-Human paradigm that exalts Techne and obscures Anthropos, exposing the subject to new forms of dehumanisation. Hence the challenge launched by Morin and relaunched by Cambi and Pinto Minerva, of a bet-of-resistance in order to avoid the drift of human beings and their constitutive qualities: self-determination, freedom, reflexivity and self-awareness, which form the basis of the Subject-Individual-Person who has produced technology but also holds the tools to investigate it. This leads to the need for pedagogy – as knowledge and practice – to resignify humanitas, starting from schools and their educational practices, in order to govern change through a renewed phronesis for the onlife era: a new type of knowledge and critical judgement capable of guiding actions and contributing to the human education of the human being, integrating ethics, responsibility and critical thinking.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CARLETTI-LAVANGA_ONLINE.pdf
non disponiibile
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
209.86 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
209.86 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1322355
