The ability to combine linguistic units—known as merge—has been shown to be lateralised to the left hemisphere of the brain (Zaccarella & Friederici, 2015). Merge is thought to underlie the combination of stems and affixes in regular verbs (e.g., chews = chew + s). However, some accounts suggest that this applies primarily to infrequent regular verbs, while frequent forms may be stored as whole lexical units (Pinker & Ullman, 2002). If this idea is correct, only infrequent regular verbs should elicit lateralised neural processing. Twenty right-handed native English speakers underwent EEG recording during a mismatch negativity (MMN) task, comparing the pairs chewed–chews (low frequency) and cared–cares (high frequency). All stimuli were phonetically matched, uttered in Received Pronunciation and thus consisting of a CVC sequence. Results showed that only the low-frequency pair chewed–chews elicited a lateralised negativity, while the high-frequency pair cared–cares produced a more distributed pattern of activation. These findings may offer preliminary evidence that frequent regular verbs are less likely to engage merge-based combinatorial processes, whereas infrequent regular verbs are more likely to do so.
Cilibrasi, L., Stojanovik, V. (2024). Frequency effects and morpheme stripping in English verbs. RGG. RIVISTA DI GRAMMATICA GENERATIVA, 46(3), 1-15.
Frequency effects and morpheme stripping in English verbs
Luca Cilibrasi
;
2024-01-01
Abstract
The ability to combine linguistic units—known as merge—has been shown to be lateralised to the left hemisphere of the brain (Zaccarella & Friederici, 2015). Merge is thought to underlie the combination of stems and affixes in regular verbs (e.g., chews = chew + s). However, some accounts suggest that this applies primarily to infrequent regular verbs, while frequent forms may be stored as whole lexical units (Pinker & Ullman, 2002). If this idea is correct, only infrequent regular verbs should elicit lateralised neural processing. Twenty right-handed native English speakers underwent EEG recording during a mismatch negativity (MMN) task, comparing the pairs chewed–chews (low frequency) and cared–cares (high frequency). All stimuli were phonetically matched, uttered in Received Pronunciation and thus consisting of a CVC sequence. Results showed that only the low-frequency pair chewed–chews elicited a lateralised negativity, while the high-frequency pair cared–cares produced a more distributed pattern of activation. These findings may offer preliminary evidence that frequent regular verbs are less likely to engage merge-based combinatorial processes, whereas infrequent regular verbs are more likely to do so.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RGG.2024.final.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
582.93 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
582.93 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1292794
