Purpose of review: To investigate the association between the olfactory dysfunction and the more typical symptoms (fever, cough, dyspnoea) within the Sars-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) in hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Recent findings: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were reviewed from May 5, 2020, to June 1, 2020. Inclusion criteria included English, French, German, Spanish or Italian language studies containing original data related to COVID19, anosmia, fever, cough, and dyspnoea, in both hospital and non-hospital settings. Two investigators independently reviewed all manuscripts and performed quality assessment and quantitative meta-analysis using validated tools. A third author arbitrated full-text disagreements. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), 11 of 135 studies fulfilled eligibility. Anosmia was estimated less prevalent than fever and cough (respectively rate difference = − 0.316, 95% CI: − 0.574 to − 0.058, Z = − 2.404, p < 0.016, k = 11 and rate difference = − 0.249, 95% CI: − 0.402 to − 0.096, Z = − 3.185, p < 0.001, k = 11); the analysis between anosmia and dyspnoea was not significant (rate difference = − 0.008, 95% CI: − 0.166 to 0.150, Z = − 0.099, p < 0.921, k = 8). The typical symptoms were significantly more frequent than anosmia in hospitalized more critical patients than in non-hospitalized ones (respectively [Q(1) = 50.638 p < 0.000, Q(1) = 52.520 p < 0.000, Q(1) = 100.734 p < 0.000). Summary: Patient with new onset olfactory dysfunction should be investigated for COVID-19. Anosmia is more frequent in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients than in hospitalized ones. © 2020, The Author(s).
Giorli, A., Ferretti, F., Biagini, C., Salerni, L., Bindi, I., Dasgupta, S., et al. (2020). A Literature Systematic review with meta-analysis of symptoms prevalence in Covid-19: the relevance of olfactory symptoms in infection not requiring hospitalization. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN NEUROLOGY, 22(36), 1-14 [10.1007/s11940-020-00641-5].
A Literature Systematic review with meta-analysis of symptoms prevalence in Covid-19: the relevance of olfactory symptoms in infection not requiring hospitalization
Giorli A.;Ferretti F.;Salerni L.;Bindi I.;Dasgupta S.;Pozza A.;Gualtieri G.;Gusinu R.;Coluccia A.;Mandala Marco
2020-01-01
Abstract
Purpose of review: To investigate the association between the olfactory dysfunction and the more typical symptoms (fever, cough, dyspnoea) within the Sars-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) in hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Recent findings: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were reviewed from May 5, 2020, to June 1, 2020. Inclusion criteria included English, French, German, Spanish or Italian language studies containing original data related to COVID19, anosmia, fever, cough, and dyspnoea, in both hospital and non-hospital settings. Two investigators independently reviewed all manuscripts and performed quality assessment and quantitative meta-analysis using validated tools. A third author arbitrated full-text disagreements. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), 11 of 135 studies fulfilled eligibility. Anosmia was estimated less prevalent than fever and cough (respectively rate difference = − 0.316, 95% CI: − 0.574 to − 0.058, Z = − 2.404, p < 0.016, k = 11 and rate difference = − 0.249, 95% CI: − 0.402 to − 0.096, Z = − 3.185, p < 0.001, k = 11); the analysis between anosmia and dyspnoea was not significant (rate difference = − 0.008, 95% CI: − 0.166 to 0.150, Z = − 0.099, p < 0.921, k = 8). The typical symptoms were significantly more frequent than anosmia in hospitalized more critical patients than in non-hospitalized ones (respectively [Q(1) = 50.638 p < 0.000, Q(1) = 52.520 p < 0.000, Q(1) = 100.734 p < 0.000). Summary: Patient with new onset olfactory dysfunction should be investigated for COVID-19. Anosmia is more frequent in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients than in hospitalized ones. © 2020, The Author(s).File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
A Literature Systematic Review With meta-analysis-Giorli-2020.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.29 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.29 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1115608