Background: In the clinical practice, transparent films are used as sterile interfaces in in vivo dermatologic imaging in order to prevent the transmissions of infections. However, in our experience, the use of a transparent film can alter skin images. Our study aimed to compare the optical quality of a series of different plastic films used as interfaces in order to understand if some might be more suitable for imaging. Materials and methods: We tested the optical properties of 11 different protective transparent films that are marketed in France with a transparency meter and a spectrophotometer. Results: Transmission, minimal diffusion, amount of gray, and contrast were obtained for each transparent film. Transmission ranged from 93.24% to 96.88% (mean 95.36; standard deviation SD 1.02), minimal diffusion from 88.28% to 123.87% (mean 101.04; standard deviation SD 10.02) and contrast from 11.01 to 15.88 (mean 13.93 and SD 1.3). For some films, the transmission was lower at lower wavelengths. Conclusion: All tested films had excellent optical properties. However, some of them had better optical qualities and seemed more suitable for their use in dermatologic imaging. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Cinotti, E., Campoli, M., Pataia, G., Ouerdane, Y., Thuret, G., Gain, P., et al. (2019). How transparent film applied on dermatologic imaging devices in order to prevent infections affects image quality?. SKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 25(2), 229-233 [10.1111/srt.12642].

How transparent film applied on dermatologic imaging devices in order to prevent infections affects image quality?

Cinotti E.;Campoli M.;Tognetti L.;Rubegni P.
2019-01-01

Abstract

Background: In the clinical practice, transparent films are used as sterile interfaces in in vivo dermatologic imaging in order to prevent the transmissions of infections. However, in our experience, the use of a transparent film can alter skin images. Our study aimed to compare the optical quality of a series of different plastic films used as interfaces in order to understand if some might be more suitable for imaging. Materials and methods: We tested the optical properties of 11 different protective transparent films that are marketed in France with a transparency meter and a spectrophotometer. Results: Transmission, minimal diffusion, amount of gray, and contrast were obtained for each transparent film. Transmission ranged from 93.24% to 96.88% (mean 95.36; standard deviation SD 1.02), minimal diffusion from 88.28% to 123.87% (mean 101.04; standard deviation SD 10.02) and contrast from 11.01 to 15.88 (mean 13.93 and SD 1.3). For some films, the transmission was lower at lower wavelengths. Conclusion: All tested films had excellent optical properties. However, some of them had better optical qualities and seemed more suitable for their use in dermatologic imaging. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2019
Cinotti, E., Campoli, M., Pataia, G., Ouerdane, Y., Thuret, G., Gain, P., et al. (2019). How transparent film applied on dermatologic imaging devices in order to prevent infections affects image quality?. SKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 25(2), 229-233 [10.1111/srt.12642].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
How transparent film applied on.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 504.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
504.45 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1105614