As the author has argued in a previous paper, CIL IV, 5296 is only the rather clumsy and partial transcription of a poem that has not been composed by the graffito writer himself; its author – very likely a woman – was working with a rather good knowledge of the Latin literary culture. Expanding on these conclusions, this study analyzes some textual and prosodic problems; provides some insight on the compositional technique and structure of the short poem; highlights the interest but also the uncertainties of the gender issues raised by the text.
Graverini, L. (2017). Further Thoughts on CIL IV, 5296 – CLE 950: Textual Problems, Structure, and Gender Issues. LATOMUS, 76(1), 114-126.
Further Thoughts on CIL IV, 5296 – CLE 950: Textual Problems, Structure, and Gender Issues
GRAVERINI, LUCA
2017-01-01
Abstract
As the author has argued in a previous paper, CIL IV, 5296 is only the rather clumsy and partial transcription of a poem that has not been composed by the graffito writer himself; its author – very likely a woman – was working with a rather good knowledge of the Latin literary culture. Expanding on these conclusions, this study analyzes some textual and prosodic problems; provides some insight on the compositional technique and structure of the short poem; highlights the interest but also the uncertainties of the gender issues raised by the text.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Graverini 2017 - Further thoughts Latomus.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: Graverini 2017 - Further Thoughts on CIL IV 5296
Tipologia:
Post-print
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.05 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.05 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/998235