In this squib I compare the properties of arbitrary plural pro in subject position in Italian with those of the implicit external argument of a ‘short passive’. I show that the two types of null arbitrary arguments display the same quantificational variability, but differ crucially with respect to inclusiveness: the arbitrary null subject of an active clause only allows for an exclusive interpretation, i.e. excluding the speaker and hearer(s), whereas the implicit agent of a short passive readily allows for an inclusive interpretation. I hypothesize that this is due to the fact that in active clauses, the null arbitrary subject checks a [person] feature against the phi-complete T probe; in short passives, instead, the null agent, even if syntactically realized – as proposed by Collins (2005) – cannot Agree with a phi-complete probe endowed with [person]: this underspecification explains why its interpretation is not restricted so as to exclude speaker and hearer(s).
Scheda prodotto non validato
Scheda prodotto in fase di analisi da parte dello staff di validazione
|Titolo:||Italian arbitrary external arguments in active and passive clauses|
|Citazione:||Bianchi, V. (2015). Italian arbitrary external arguments in active and passive clauses. RGG. RIVISTA DI GRAMMATICA GENERATIVA, 37, 1-16.|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||1.1 Articolo in rivista|
File in questo prodotto: