Sixteen Apennine chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata (10 females, 6 males) were released into a protected area, the Sibillini Mountains National Park, Central Apennines, Italy, and monitored using global positioning system radio tags during 2008–2010. Founders caught in the wild (n58) and those reared in large enclosures (n58) differed in movement frequency (inter-fix distance per hour) and maximum distance covered (from the release site) in the first 5 months after release: both were significantly greater in wild individuals, males moved significantly more than females, wild individuals shifted their home ranges significantly more often than captive ones, and no differences were observed between the sexes or age classes. A mixed strategy of selection of wild and captive founders has proven successful in preventing large movements in the initial stages of release yet still providing sufficient opportunity to avoid inbreeding depression.

Bocci, A., Menapace, S., Alemanno, S., Lovari, S. (2016). Conservation introduction of the threatened Apennine chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata: Post-release dispersal differs between wild-caught and captive founders. ORYX, 50(1), 128-133 [10.1017/S0030605314000039].

Conservation introduction of the threatened Apennine chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata: Post-release dispersal differs between wild-caught and captive founders

BOCCI, ANNA;MENAPACE, SOFIA;ALEMANNO, SIMONE;LOVARI, SANDRO
2016-01-01

Abstract

Sixteen Apennine chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata (10 females, 6 males) were released into a protected area, the Sibillini Mountains National Park, Central Apennines, Italy, and monitored using global positioning system radio tags during 2008–2010. Founders caught in the wild (n58) and those reared in large enclosures (n58) differed in movement frequency (inter-fix distance per hour) and maximum distance covered (from the release site) in the first 5 months after release: both were significantly greater in wild individuals, males moved significantly more than females, wild individuals shifted their home ranges significantly more often than captive ones, and no differences were observed between the sexes or age classes. A mixed strategy of selection of wild and captive founders has proven successful in preventing large movements in the initial stages of release yet still providing sufficient opportunity to avoid inbreeding depression.
2016
Bocci, A., Menapace, S., Alemanno, S., Lovari, S. (2016). Conservation introduction of the threatened Apennine chamois Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata: Post-release dispersal differs between wild-caught and captive founders. ORYX, 50(1), 128-133 [10.1017/S0030605314000039].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/989783
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo