The authors describe three years of clinical experience in chronic wound management. The authors treated 315 patients (age 65-75 years) with chronic recurrent leg ulcers by allograft of cryopreserved dermis. Patients were divided into two groups (A and B) on the basis of patient preference and underwent two different reepithelization techniques. Patients in group A received autologous thin mesh grafts. Patients in group B received cultured autologous epidermal grafts. Proportions were compared by univariate analysis (χ2 test with the Yates correction; Epilnfo version 5).
Pianigiani, E., Di Simplicio Cherubini, F., Ierardi, F., Taddeucci, P., Andreassi, A., Perotti, R., et al. (2004). Dermal allograft plus autologous epidermal graft: evaluation of two different tecniques in chronic, non healing leg ulcers. WOUNDS, 16(3), 91-96.
Dermal allograft plus autologous epidermal graft: evaluation of two different tecniques in chronic, non healing leg ulcers
Taddeucci, Paolo;Perotti, Roberto;Biagioli, Maurizio;Fimiani, Michele
2004-01-01
Abstract
The authors describe three years of clinical experience in chronic wound management. The authors treated 315 patients (age 65-75 years) with chronic recurrent leg ulcers by allograft of cryopreserved dermis. Patients were divided into two groups (A and B) on the basis of patient preference and underwent two different reepithelization techniques. Patients in group A received autologous thin mesh grafts. Patients in group B received cultured autologous epidermal grafts. Proportions were compared by univariate analysis (χ2 test with the Yates correction; Epilnfo version 5).
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/9528
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo