AIMS: To assess the test-retest variability of intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) measurements utilising dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and to evaluate possible influential factors. METHODS: The study included 350 consecutive subjects (175 glaucoma, 175 control; one eye per subject) from seven European centres. IOP was measured once with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and twice by DCT (DCT1, DCT2) in a randomised sequence. OPA was also recorded for both DCT measurements. Differences (DCT1-DCT2; OPA1-OPA2; GAT-DCT1; GAT-DCT2) were assessed using the t test. The intraclass coefficient of correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV) for DCT and OPA were calculated. RESULTS: DCT1 was 0.6+/-1.6 mm Hg higher than DCT2 (p<0.001); OPA1 was 0.1+/-0.7 mm Hg higher than OPA2 (p=0.02). Results were not influenced by randomisation test order. In both glaucoma and normal subjects, DCT and OPA showed ICC>0.90 and >0.76, and CoV=4.8-5.0% and 10.3-10.5%, respectively. DCT1 and 2 were 2.4+/-2.6 and 1.8+/-2.6 mm Hg higher respectively than GAT (p<0.001). DISCUSSION: DCT test-retest variability was almost perfect for IOP and good for OPA. Tonometry measurements with DCT tended to be overestimated compared with GAT.

Fogagnolo, P., Figus, M., Frezzotti, P., Iester, M., Oddone, F., Zeppieri, M., et al. (2010). Test-retest variability of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude for dynamic contour tonometry: a multicentre study. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 94(4), 419-423 [10.1136/bjo.2009.165142].

Test-retest variability of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude for dynamic contour tonometry: a multicentre study.

FREZZOTTI, PAOLO;
2010

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the test-retest variability of intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) measurements utilising dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and to evaluate possible influential factors. METHODS: The study included 350 consecutive subjects (175 glaucoma, 175 control; one eye per subject) from seven European centres. IOP was measured once with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and twice by DCT (DCT1, DCT2) in a randomised sequence. OPA was also recorded for both DCT measurements. Differences (DCT1-DCT2; OPA1-OPA2; GAT-DCT1; GAT-DCT2) were assessed using the t test. The intraclass coefficient of correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV) for DCT and OPA were calculated. RESULTS: DCT1 was 0.6+/-1.6 mm Hg higher than DCT2 (p<0.001); OPA1 was 0.1+/-0.7 mm Hg higher than OPA2 (p=0.02). Results were not influenced by randomisation test order. In both glaucoma and normal subjects, DCT and OPA showed ICC>0.90 and >0.76, and CoV=4.8-5.0% and 10.3-10.5%, respectively. DCT1 and 2 were 2.4+/-2.6 and 1.8+/-2.6 mm Hg higher respectively than GAT (p<0.001). DISCUSSION: DCT test-retest variability was almost perfect for IOP and good for OPA. Tonometry measurements with DCT tended to be overestimated compared with GAT.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11365/45103
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo