Xu et al., in this issue of the Journal of Vegetation Science, compare several species richness estimators. All the non-parametric estimators, such as Chao and jackknife estimators, underestimated the true number, whereas all the area-based models, based on species–area curves, overestimated it. No reliable method yet exists to predict the number of species in an area that is appreciably larger than the one(s) sampled.

Chiarucci, A. (2012). Estimating species richness: still a long way off!. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 23(6), 1003-1005 [10.1111/jvs.12003].

Estimating species richness: still a long way off!

CHIARUCCI, ALESSANDRO
2012-01-01

Abstract

Xu et al., in this issue of the Journal of Vegetation Science, compare several species richness estimators. All the non-parametric estimators, such as Chao and jackknife estimators, underestimated the true number, whereas all the area-based models, based on species–area curves, overestimated it. No reliable method yet exists to predict the number of species in an area that is appreciably larger than the one(s) sampled.
2012
Chiarucci, A. (2012). Estimating species richness: still a long way off!. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 23(6), 1003-1005 [10.1111/jvs.12003].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2012_JVS_b.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 97.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
97.59 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/43638
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo