The paper is a critique of discourse theory and argumentation theory of truth, in particular in the version of Wolfgang Becker. One of the main criticism is that the structure of arguments is designed in such a way as to guide a process of cognising that the truth criteria of the claim are fulfilled. This implies that argumentation (and argumentation theory) presupposes independent truth criteria. Hence an argumentation theory of truth is viciously circular.
Lumer, C. (1990). Diskurs- und Argumentationstheorie der Wahrheit?. ETHIK UND SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTEN, 1, 363-365.
Diskurs- und Argumentationstheorie der Wahrheit?
LUMER, CHRISTOPH
1990-01-01
Abstract
The paper is a critique of discourse theory and argumentation theory of truth, in particular in the version of Wolfgang Becker. One of the main criticism is that the structure of arguments is designed in such a way as to guide a process of cognising that the truth criteria of the claim are fulfilled. This implies that argumentation (and argumentation theory) presupposes independent truth criteria. Hence an argumentation theory of truth is viciously circular.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/36084
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo