Purpose: To evaluate the interfacial microtensile bond strength between a fiber-reinforced post (Rely X Post) and a core material (Multicore Flow) after placing different bonding agents. Materials and Methods: After post surface treatment, 50 posts were divided into 5 groups. Group 1: Adper Prompt-LPop; group 2: SingleBond2; group 3: ScotchBond Multipurpose Plus; group 4: experimental bonding system (wet ethanol bonding technique); group 5: control group. After core reconstruction, the samples were tested with the microtensile test. Fracture type examination and SEM observation followed. Data were statistically analyzed with Kruskall-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA. Results: Microtensile testing revealed significant differences (p < 0.001). There were no differences between groups 1 to 4, but there was a statistically significant difference between groups 1 to 4 and the control. Fracture type observations revealed more adhesive failures than cohesive or mixed ones. Conclusion: The experimental bonding technique did not improve bond strength compared to the different adhesive systems tested. However, placing a bonding agent beween the post and the core seems to significantly increase microtensile bond strength. © 2009 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.

Ounsi, H.f., Salameh, Z., Carvalho, C.a., Cantoro, A., Grandini, S., Ferrari, M. (2009). Bond strength of composite core build-up materials to fiber-reinforced posts: a microtensile comparison between conventional and wet-ethanol bonding systems. JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 11(5), 375-380.

Bond strength of composite core build-up materials to fiber-reinforced posts: a microtensile comparison between conventional and wet-ethanol bonding systems.

GRANDINI, SIMONE;FERRARI, MARCO
2009-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the interfacial microtensile bond strength between a fiber-reinforced post (Rely X Post) and a core material (Multicore Flow) after placing different bonding agents. Materials and Methods: After post surface treatment, 50 posts were divided into 5 groups. Group 1: Adper Prompt-LPop; group 2: SingleBond2; group 3: ScotchBond Multipurpose Plus; group 4: experimental bonding system (wet ethanol bonding technique); group 5: control group. After core reconstruction, the samples were tested with the microtensile test. Fracture type examination and SEM observation followed. Data were statistically analyzed with Kruskall-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA. Results: Microtensile testing revealed significant differences (p < 0.001). There were no differences between groups 1 to 4, but there was a statistically significant difference between groups 1 to 4 and the control. Fracture type observations revealed more adhesive failures than cohesive or mixed ones. Conclusion: The experimental bonding technique did not improve bond strength compared to the different adhesive systems tested. However, placing a bonding agent beween the post and the core seems to significantly increase microtensile bond strength. © 2009 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.
2009
Ounsi, H.f., Salameh, Z., Carvalho, C.a., Cantoro, A., Grandini, S., Ferrari, M. (2009). Bond strength of composite core build-up materials to fiber-reinforced posts: a microtensile comparison between conventional and wet-ethanol bonding systems. JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 11(5), 375-380.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/33942