Diabatic surfaces for two-bond cycloaddition reactions are examined in terms of a diabatic surface analysis which includes the computation of the resonance interaction between the reactant-like and product-like diabatic surfaces. A qualitative analysis and rigorous numerical computations are presented for a concerted synchronous mechanism (a two-bond process), a concerted asynchronous mechanism (a concerted one-bond process), and the first step of a two-step mechanism (a nonconcerted one-bond process) for both “allowed” and “forbidden” processes. The results illustrate that the resonance interaction is the dominant factor which controls the mechanistic preference between two-bond and one-bond processes. For a Woodward-Hoffmann forbidden process, the magnitude of the resonance interaction is found to be much smaller for the (forbidden) synchronous process than for the one-bond process; this leads to the expected preference for the one-bond process. For a Woodward-Hoffmann allowed process in the comparison of a concerted two-bond mechanism and the first step of a two-step mechanism, it is found that magnitude of the resonance interaction at the transition structure geometry can lead to a preference for the concerted process. © 1987, American Chemical Society. All rights reserved.
Bernardi, F., Olivucci, M., Mcdouall, J.J., Robb, M.A. (1987). Diabatic surfaces for two-bond addition reactions. Role of resonance interaction. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 109(2), 544-553 [10.1021/ja00236a037].
Diabatic surfaces for two-bond addition reactions. Role of resonance interaction
Olivucci, M.;
1987-01-01
Abstract
Diabatic surfaces for two-bond cycloaddition reactions are examined in terms of a diabatic surface analysis which includes the computation of the resonance interaction between the reactant-like and product-like diabatic surfaces. A qualitative analysis and rigorous numerical computations are presented for a concerted synchronous mechanism (a two-bond process), a concerted asynchronous mechanism (a concerted one-bond process), and the first step of a two-step mechanism (a nonconcerted one-bond process) for both “allowed” and “forbidden” processes. The results illustrate that the resonance interaction is the dominant factor which controls the mechanistic preference between two-bond and one-bond processes. For a Woodward-Hoffmann forbidden process, the magnitude of the resonance interaction is found to be much smaller for the (forbidden) synchronous process than for the one-bond process; this leads to the expected preference for the one-bond process. For a Woodward-Hoffmann allowed process in the comparison of a concerted two-bond mechanism and the first step of a two-step mechanism, it is found that magnitude of the resonance interaction at the transition structure geometry can lead to a preference for the concerted process. © 1987, American Chemical Society. All rights reserved.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/32577
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo