BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is in the critical analysis of the results of the lap and open surgery in the colorectal carcinoma, through the meta-analysis of the principal trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic search of the comparative studies has been made among lap and open surgery in the colorectal carcinoma, using PubMed and Cochrane Library. Among these, have been selected perspective studies containing the description of the surgical techniques, the perioperative results and the oncological long term results. Statistic analysis has been performed with the program NCSS (Kaysville 2006, Utah). RESULTS: From the revision of the literature, 7 perspective studies have checked fit to a meta-analysis, for a total of 3580 patients. Among the operative outcomes, has been observed, with statistically significant, a reduction of the blood loss and of the morbidity, an earlier resumption to passing flatus and to normal diet, a reduction of the postoperative hospitalization for the lap; shorter operative time is releaved for the open surgery. Statistically significant differences have emerged neither on the other surgical outcomes (included mortality) nor on relapset of illness (regional or metastasis), crab-correlated mortality, long term survival. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic can be considered a valid alternative to the traditional open surgery in the therapy of the colorectal carcinoma: the advantages consist in smaller trauma and reduction of morbidity and postoperative stay. The oncological results are the same of the open surgery.

Coratti, F., Coratti, A., Malatesti, R., Testi, W., Tani, F. (2009). Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of the chief trials [Laparoscopia vs. laparotomia nelle resezioni per cancro colorettale. Metanalisi dei principali trial]. IL GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 30(8-9), 377-384.

Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of the chief trials [Laparoscopia vs. laparotomia nelle resezioni per cancro colorettale. Metanalisi dei principali trial]

Testi W.;Tani F.
2009-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is in the critical analysis of the results of the lap and open surgery in the colorectal carcinoma, through the meta-analysis of the principal trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic search of the comparative studies has been made among lap and open surgery in the colorectal carcinoma, using PubMed and Cochrane Library. Among these, have been selected perspective studies containing the description of the surgical techniques, the perioperative results and the oncological long term results. Statistic analysis has been performed with the program NCSS (Kaysville 2006, Utah). RESULTS: From the revision of the literature, 7 perspective studies have checked fit to a meta-analysis, for a total of 3580 patients. Among the operative outcomes, has been observed, with statistically significant, a reduction of the blood loss and of the morbidity, an earlier resumption to passing flatus and to normal diet, a reduction of the postoperative hospitalization for the lap; shorter operative time is releaved for the open surgery. Statistically significant differences have emerged neither on the other surgical outcomes (included mortality) nor on relapset of illness (regional or metastasis), crab-correlated mortality, long term survival. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic can be considered a valid alternative to the traditional open surgery in the therapy of the colorectal carcinoma: the advantages consist in smaller trauma and reduction of morbidity and postoperative stay. The oncological results are the same of the open surgery.
2009
Coratti, F., Coratti, A., Malatesti, R., Testi, W., Tani, F. (2009). Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of the chief trials [Laparoscopia vs. laparotomia nelle resezioni per cancro colorettale. Metanalisi dei principali trial]. IL GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 30(8-9), 377-384.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
laparoscopia-vs-laparotomia-2009.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Articolo
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 95.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
95.03 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/3126
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo