In the insurance literature, it is often argued that private markets can provide insurance against ‘risks’ but not against ‘uncertainties’ in the sense of Knight or Keynes. This claim is at odds with the standard economic model of risk exchange which, in assuming that decision-makers are always guided by point-valued subjective probabilities, predicts that all uncertainties can, in theory, be insured. Supporters of the standard model argue that the insuring of highly idiosyncratic risks by Lloyd's of London proves that this is so even in practice. The purpose of this article is to show that Bruno de Finetti, famous as one of the three founding fathers of the subjective approach to probability assumed by the standard model, actually made a theoretical case for uncertainty within the subjectivist approach. We draw on empirical evidence from the practice of underwriters to show how this case may help explain the reluctance of insurers to cover highly uncertain contingencies.
Scheda prodotto non validato
Scheda prodotto in fase di analisi da parte dello staff di validazione
|Titolo:||De Finetti on the Insurance of Risks and Uncertainties|
|Citazione:||Feduzi, A., Runde, J., & Zappia, C. (2012). De Finetti on the Insurance of Risks and Uncertainties. BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 63(2), 329-356.|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||1.1 Articolo in rivista|