We examined the literature on ethical decisions regarding neonates, to assess whether personal beliefs and prejudices influence end-of-life decisions taken by caregivers. Studies show that religion and familiarity with disability influence caregivers' decisions, whereas the influx of already being a parent, age, sex and professional experience is controverse. Caregivers' attitudes towards end-of-life decisions are also affected by personal concerns about litigation, prejudices and their view of disability. The concept of 'poor quality of life' is widely used as a reference in end-of-life decisions, but this can be interpreted differently, leaving room for a wide range of personal viewpoints. In most cases, parents' opinions are considered important and are sometimes the main determinant in decision making. However, it is unclear whether parents' decisions are based on their own wishes or on the best interests of the newborn. Conclusion: In neonatal end-of-life decisions, patients may not receive cures based only on their best interests.
Bellieni, C.v., & Buonocore, G. (2009). Flaws in the assessment of the best interests of the newborn. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 98(4), 613-617.
Scheda prodotto non validato
Scheda prodotto in fase di analisi da parte dello staff di validazione
|Titolo:||Flaws in the assessment of the best interests of the newborn.|
|Citazione:||Bellieni, C.v., & Buonocore, G. (2009). Flaws in the assessment of the best interests of the newborn. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 98(4), 613-617.|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||1.1 Articolo in rivista|
File in questo prodotto: