Conventional wisdom holds that Fully Funded (FF) pension schemes would better prepare the community for ongoing demographic change. Many critics of FF schemes argue that these plans would encounter problems similar to those that create financial difficulties to Pay-As-You-Go (PAYG) schemes. More specifically, they maintain that, whereas in a PAYG scheme a decrease in the working population with respect to an increasing elderly population undermines the financial source of pension transfers, by the same token in an FF scheme a diminished number of young savers would make the absorption of the capital assets accumulated by the pension funds difficult. This paper assesses the mainstream claim and its criticism in the light of the neoclassical foundations of the dominant view. It will emerge that the criticism is partially correct, but we arrive at this conclusion through reasoning that does not bypass the theoretical foundations of the mainstream claim. The capital theory critique is shown to be relevant in this respect.

Cesaratto, S. (2007). Are PAYG and FF Pension Schemes Equivalent Systems? Macroeconomic Considerations in the Light of Alternative Economic Theories. REVIEW OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 19(4), 449-473 [10.1080/09538250701622287].

Are PAYG and FF Pension Schemes Equivalent Systems? Macroeconomic Considerations in the Light of Alternative Economic Theories

CESARATTO, SERGIO
2007

Abstract

Conventional wisdom holds that Fully Funded (FF) pension schemes would better prepare the community for ongoing demographic change. Many critics of FF schemes argue that these plans would encounter problems similar to those that create financial difficulties to Pay-As-You-Go (PAYG) schemes. More specifically, they maintain that, whereas in a PAYG scheme a decrease in the working population with respect to an increasing elderly population undermines the financial source of pension transfers, by the same token in an FF scheme a diminished number of young savers would make the absorption of the capital assets accumulated by the pension funds difficult. This paper assesses the mainstream claim and its criticism in the light of the neoclassical foundations of the dominant view. It will emerge that the criticism is partially correct, but we arrive at this conclusion through reasoning that does not bypass the theoretical foundations of the mainstream claim. The capital theory critique is shown to be relevant in this respect.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Rope 2007.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 138.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
138.77 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11365/23863
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo