In his ‘Comments’, Tom Michl defends the proposal for a fully funded pension scheme based on a saving-led ‘classical growth model’ against my Keynesian contention that a higher saving supply would be deflationary in both the short run and the long run. Michl adds a further argument that an increase in the saving rate associated with a lower interest rate may speed up the accumulation process. I remark that the thesis that a lower interest rate has a positive influence on investment is empirically and theoretically controversial, while the idea that an increase in investment requires a larger saving supply is open to further Keynesian objections.
Cesaratto, S. (2006). A Reply to Michl. CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 30, 985-987 [10.1093/cje/bel026].
A Reply to Michl
CESARATTO, SERGIO
2006-01-01
Abstract
In his ‘Comments’, Tom Michl defends the proposal for a fully funded pension scheme based on a saving-led ‘classical growth model’ against my Keynesian contention that a higher saving supply would be deflationary in both the short run and the long run. Michl adds a further argument that an increase in the saving rate associated with a lower interest rate may speed up the accumulation process. I remark that the thesis that a lower interest rate has a positive influence on investment is empirically and theoretically controversial, while the idea that an increase in investment requires a larger saving supply is open to further Keynesian objections.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CJE on Michl.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Post-print
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
36.95 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
36.95 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/23578
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo