Purpose: The recent development of compounds with anabolic action on bone have increased the range of therapeutic options for the treatment of osteoporosis and the prevention of fractures. Two major PTH analogs, the synthetic full-length 1-84 PTH molecule and the recombinant 1-34 N-terminal fragment (teriparatide), are available for the treatment of osteoporosis in many countries. There have bee no comparative trials on the bone anabolic effects of these compounds. Materials and methods: In this study we applied a mixed treatment comparison (MTC) to compare the efficacy of teriparatide versus PTH 1-84 for the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in women with severe osteoporosis. With this approach the relative treatment effect of one intervention over another can be obtained in the absence of head-to-head comparison. Among the candidate papers selected for analysis, two randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of teriparatide and PTH 1-84 met the selection criteria and underwent MTC analysis. Results: Based on a fixed-effect MTC model analysis of data from two RCTs, teriparatide (20g/day) showed a 70% and 94% probability of being the best treatment for the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, respectively. Together with a lack of statistical significance, this study has additional limitations. Some differences in trial procedures and populations exist; another limitation concerns the impossibility of carrying out a randomized-effect model MTC, due to sample exiguity. Furthermore, in order to consider unknown or unmeasured differences of covariates across trials, a random-effects approach would be preferred in order to assess the presence of heterogeneity across comparisons. In contrast, in our analysis a fixed-effect MTC model only was used. Conclusions: Teriparatide is expected to provide a greater efficacy over PTH 1-84 with both vertebral and non-vertebral fracture prevention in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis. © 2012 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved.

Migliore, A., Broccoli, S., Massafra, U., Bizzi, E., Frediani, B. (2012). Mixed-treatment comparison of anabolic (teriparatide and PTH 1-84) therapies in women with severe osteoporosis. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 28(3), 467-473 [10.1185/03007995.2012.659724].

Mixed-treatment comparison of anabolic (teriparatide and PTH 1-84) therapies in women with severe osteoporosis

Frediani B.
2012-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: The recent development of compounds with anabolic action on bone have increased the range of therapeutic options for the treatment of osteoporosis and the prevention of fractures. Two major PTH analogs, the synthetic full-length 1-84 PTH molecule and the recombinant 1-34 N-terminal fragment (teriparatide), are available for the treatment of osteoporosis in many countries. There have bee no comparative trials on the bone anabolic effects of these compounds. Materials and methods: In this study we applied a mixed treatment comparison (MTC) to compare the efficacy of teriparatide versus PTH 1-84 for the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in women with severe osteoporosis. With this approach the relative treatment effect of one intervention over another can be obtained in the absence of head-to-head comparison. Among the candidate papers selected for analysis, two randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of teriparatide and PTH 1-84 met the selection criteria and underwent MTC analysis. Results: Based on a fixed-effect MTC model analysis of data from two RCTs, teriparatide (20g/day) showed a 70% and 94% probability of being the best treatment for the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, respectively. Together with a lack of statistical significance, this study has additional limitations. Some differences in trial procedures and populations exist; another limitation concerns the impossibility of carrying out a randomized-effect model MTC, due to sample exiguity. Furthermore, in order to consider unknown or unmeasured differences of covariates across trials, a random-effects approach would be preferred in order to assess the presence of heterogeneity across comparisons. In contrast, in our analysis a fixed-effect MTC model only was used. Conclusions: Teriparatide is expected to provide a greater efficacy over PTH 1-84 with both vertebral and non-vertebral fracture prevention in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis. © 2012 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved.
2012
Migliore, A., Broccoli, S., Massafra, U., Bizzi, E., Frediani, B. (2012). Mixed-treatment comparison of anabolic (teriparatide and PTH 1-84) therapies in women with severe osteoporosis. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 28(3), 467-473 [10.1185/03007995.2012.659724].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/20868
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo