Purpose: To microscopically evaluate the structural characteristics of post-and-core units made of a fiber post and of different types of resin-based composites used as core materials. Methods: 55 endodontically treated human maxillary incisors were prepared for receiving a fiber post (,Esthetic Post Plus). One-Step and C&B resin cement were used for luting the post. Samples were randomly divided into 11 groups. Eleven different composite materials were selected to build-up the abutment. The materials on trial were: Group 1: Z100; Group 2: Light-Core; Group 3: Lumiglass; Group 4: Gradia Direct; Group 5: Build-It!; Group 6: Tetric Ceram; Group 7: Biscore self-curing; Group 8: Unifil Flow; Group 9: Definite Flow; Group 10: Tetric Flow; Group 11: AEliteFlo. All the post-and-core specimens were cut perpendicularly to their long axis and processed for SEM observations. The presence of voids/bubbles within the resin abutment and of defects at the interface between the post surface and the core material was scored. These aspects were quantified with reference to a predefined index. The differences among the scores were tested for statistical significance (P< 0.05). Results: Cores built up with flowable composites showed the highest integrity and the best adaptation onto the post.

Monticelli, F., Goracci, C., Grandini, S., GARCÍA-GODOY, F., Ferrari, M. (2005). Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fiber post-resin core units built up with different resin composites. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 18(1), 61-65.

Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fiber post-resin core units built up with different resin composites

GORACCI C.;GRANDINI S.;FERRARI M.
2005-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: To microscopically evaluate the structural characteristics of post-and-core units made of a fiber post and of different types of resin-based composites used as core materials. Methods: 55 endodontically treated human maxillary incisors were prepared for receiving a fiber post (,Esthetic Post Plus). One-Step and C&B resin cement were used for luting the post. Samples were randomly divided into 11 groups. Eleven different composite materials were selected to build-up the abutment. The materials on trial were: Group 1: Z100; Group 2: Light-Core; Group 3: Lumiglass; Group 4: Gradia Direct; Group 5: Build-It!; Group 6: Tetric Ceram; Group 7: Biscore self-curing; Group 8: Unifil Flow; Group 9: Definite Flow; Group 10: Tetric Flow; Group 11: AEliteFlo. All the post-and-core specimens were cut perpendicularly to their long axis and processed for SEM observations. The presence of voids/bubbles within the resin abutment and of defects at the interface between the post surface and the core material was scored. These aspects were quantified with reference to a predefined index. The differences among the scores were tested for statistical significance (P< 0.05). Results: Cores built up with flowable composites showed the highest integrity and the best adaptation onto the post.
2005
Monticelli, F., Goracci, C., Grandini, S., GARCÍA-GODOY, F., Ferrari, M. (2005). Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fiber post-resin core units built up with different resin composites. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 18(1), 61-65.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/19184
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo