Objectives. To measure the microtensile bond strength to ground enamel of different types of materials used as pit and fissure sealants in combination with different substrate conditioners. Methods. From 40 sound extracted molars, eight groups of five teeth were randomly formed. The experimental groups were: (1) (C) 37% phosphoric acid/ClinPro Sealant (3M ESPE); (2) (G) 37% phosphoric acid/Guardian Seal (Kerr); (3) (E/TF) 37% phosphoric acid/Excite/Tetric Flow (Ivoclar-Vivadent) (4) (OS/UF) 37% phosphoric acid/One Step (Bisco)/UniFil Flow (GC); (5) (OS/Æ) 37% phosphoric acid/One Step/Æliteflo (Bisco); (6) (UB/UF) UniFil Bond/UniFil Flow (GC); (7) (CC/FVII) GC Cavity Conditioner/Fuji VII (GC); (8) (CC/FII) GC Cavity Conditioner/Fuji II LC Improved (GC). On the buccal of each tooth, a 5 mm high build-up was created by incrementally adding layers of the sealing material on the conditioned enamel. By serially cutting the built-up tooth, multiple beam-shaped specimens about 1 mm×1 mm in cross section were obtained, and loaded in tensile (0.5 mm/min) until failure occurred. Results. The bond strengths measured in MPa were: (C) 20.41±11.79; (G) 16.02±7.99; (E/TF) 24.06±9.67; OS/UF 15.63±9.00; (OS/AE) 9.31±6.05; (UB/UF) 4.96±3.46; (CC/FVII) 1.70±2.19; (CC/FII) 2.19±1.44. Conclusions. The conventional and the resin-modified glass ionomers measured bond strengths significantly lower than those of any resin-based materials. Failure frequently occurred cohesively within the cement. Flowable composites in combination with phosphoric acid and a total-etch adhesive performed similarly to resin-based materials specifically conceived for sealings, such as ClinPro Sealant and Guardian Seal. The bond achieved by resin composite when treating enamel with the self-etching primer used in this study (UniFil Bond) was significantly lower than that developed when the substrate was etched with 37% phosphoric acid. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Papacchini, F., Goracci, C., Sadek, F.T., Monticelli, F., GARCIA-GODOY, F., Ferrari, M. (2005). Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 33(6), 459-467 [10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.007].

Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants

GORACCI C.;FERRARI M.
2005-01-01

Abstract

Objectives. To measure the microtensile bond strength to ground enamel of different types of materials used as pit and fissure sealants in combination with different substrate conditioners. Methods. From 40 sound extracted molars, eight groups of five teeth were randomly formed. The experimental groups were: (1) (C) 37% phosphoric acid/ClinPro Sealant (3M ESPE); (2) (G) 37% phosphoric acid/Guardian Seal (Kerr); (3) (E/TF) 37% phosphoric acid/Excite/Tetric Flow (Ivoclar-Vivadent) (4) (OS/UF) 37% phosphoric acid/One Step (Bisco)/UniFil Flow (GC); (5) (OS/Æ) 37% phosphoric acid/One Step/Æliteflo (Bisco); (6) (UB/UF) UniFil Bond/UniFil Flow (GC); (7) (CC/FVII) GC Cavity Conditioner/Fuji VII (GC); (8) (CC/FII) GC Cavity Conditioner/Fuji II LC Improved (GC). On the buccal of each tooth, a 5 mm high build-up was created by incrementally adding layers of the sealing material on the conditioned enamel. By serially cutting the built-up tooth, multiple beam-shaped specimens about 1 mm×1 mm in cross section were obtained, and loaded in tensile (0.5 mm/min) until failure occurred. Results. The bond strengths measured in MPa were: (C) 20.41±11.79; (G) 16.02±7.99; (E/TF) 24.06±9.67; OS/UF 15.63±9.00; (OS/AE) 9.31±6.05; (UB/UF) 4.96±3.46; (CC/FVII) 1.70±2.19; (CC/FII) 2.19±1.44. Conclusions. The conventional and the resin-modified glass ionomers measured bond strengths significantly lower than those of any resin-based materials. Failure frequently occurred cohesively within the cement. Flowable composites in combination with phosphoric acid and a total-etch adhesive performed similarly to resin-based materials specifically conceived for sealings, such as ClinPro Sealant and Guardian Seal. The bond achieved by resin composite when treating enamel with the self-etching primer used in this study (UniFil Bond) was significantly lower than that developed when the substrate was etched with 37% phosphoric acid. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2005
Papacchini, F., Goracci, C., Sadek, F.T., Monticelli, F., GARCIA-GODOY, F., Ferrari, M. (2005). Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 33(6), 459-467 [10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.007].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sealants J Dent.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 175.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
175.47 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/18655
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo