Objectives. To evaluate the effect of short versus long application seating pressure on the bond strength of resin blocks, luted with a dual-cured resin cement (Panavia F) to pre-coated or non pre-coated dentin with an hydrophobic light-cured adhesive (Clearfil Protect Bond). Methods. Sixteen non-carious human third molars were randomly divided into six Groups (four teeth each). Cylindrical composite blocks were luted with Panavia F (Group la) and with Clearfil Protect Bond with Panavia F (Group IIa) and seating pressure was applied for 5 s. In Groups Ib and IIb, the two bonding procedures were respectively repeated, but the resin cylinder was maintained under constant pressure during the entire 3 min polymerization period for the resin cement. After storing in distilled water for 24 h, 0.9 mm x 0.9 mm sticks were produced from these luted specimens for microtensile bond testing and SEM examination. Results. The use of Clearfil Protect Bond with Panavia F produced higher bond strengths than the use of Panavia F (p < 0.05). Extending the time of pressure application up to 3 min increased the bond strength (p < 0.001) and improved the integrity of the interfacial quality. Significance. The application of sustained seating pressure during luting procedures and the additional use of a hydrophobic light-cured adhesive both improve the final bond strength of the resin cement. (C) 2006 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Chieffi, N., Chersoni, S., Papacchini, F., Vano, M., Goracci, C., Davidson, C.L., et al. (2007). The effect of application sustained seating pressure on adhesive luting procedure. DENTAL MATERIALS, 23(2), 1159-1164 [10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.006].

The effect of application sustained seating pressure on adhesive luting procedure

GORACCI C.;FERRARI M.
2007-01-01

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate the effect of short versus long application seating pressure on the bond strength of resin blocks, luted with a dual-cured resin cement (Panavia F) to pre-coated or non pre-coated dentin with an hydrophobic light-cured adhesive (Clearfil Protect Bond). Methods. Sixteen non-carious human third molars were randomly divided into six Groups (four teeth each). Cylindrical composite blocks were luted with Panavia F (Group la) and with Clearfil Protect Bond with Panavia F (Group IIa) and seating pressure was applied for 5 s. In Groups Ib and IIb, the two bonding procedures were respectively repeated, but the resin cylinder was maintained under constant pressure during the entire 3 min polymerization period for the resin cement. After storing in distilled water for 24 h, 0.9 mm x 0.9 mm sticks were produced from these luted specimens for microtensile bond testing and SEM examination. Results. The use of Clearfil Protect Bond with Panavia F produced higher bond strengths than the use of Panavia F (p < 0.05). Extending the time of pressure application up to 3 min increased the bond strength (p < 0.001) and improved the integrity of the interfacial quality. Significance. The application of sustained seating pressure during luting procedures and the additional use of a hydrophobic light-cured adhesive both improve the final bond strength of the resin cement. (C) 2006 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2007
Chieffi, N., Chersoni, S., Papacchini, F., Vano, M., Goracci, C., Davidson, C.L., et al. (2007). The effect of application sustained seating pressure on adhesive luting procedure. DENTAL MATERIALS, 23(2), 1159-1164 [10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.006].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Chieffi Dent Mat 2007.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 859.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
859.97 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/18581
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo