Delayed graft function, defined as the need of dialysis in the first week after transplantation, neither due to immunological nor technical causes, determines a poor outcome of renal grafts. Delayed graft function is related to the cold ischemia time, which is shorter in local allocation programs. These, however, do not assure an optimal HLA-A,B,DR matching that can be provided by national allocation organizations. We reviewed 160 cadaveric kidney grafts performed in our local transplant network. Owing to the long waiting list caused by organ shortage, we were able to ensure both a high-grade histocompatibility and short cold ischemia times. The mean HLA-B,DR mismatch was 1.17. Cold ischemia time was < 24 h in 85% of cases. The incidence of DGF was 23.1%. In our experience a regional sharing program in the case of organ shortage provides good graft outcome (86.9% graft survival at 1 yr) with low incidence of delayed graft function.

Bertoni, E., Carmellini, M., Bandini, S., Tosi, P., Zanazzi, M., Rosati, A., et al. (1997). Regional vs. national renal sharing organizations: pros and cons. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 11(3), 214-216.

Regional vs. national renal sharing organizations: pros and cons

Carmellini, Mario;Tosi, Pierluigi;
1997-01-01

Abstract

Delayed graft function, defined as the need of dialysis in the first week after transplantation, neither due to immunological nor technical causes, determines a poor outcome of renal grafts. Delayed graft function is related to the cold ischemia time, which is shorter in local allocation programs. These, however, do not assure an optimal HLA-A,B,DR matching that can be provided by national allocation organizations. We reviewed 160 cadaveric kidney grafts performed in our local transplant network. Owing to the long waiting list caused by organ shortage, we were able to ensure both a high-grade histocompatibility and short cold ischemia times. The mean HLA-B,DR mismatch was 1.17. Cold ischemia time was < 24 h in 85% of cases. The incidence of DGF was 23.1%. In our experience a regional sharing program in the case of organ shortage provides good graft outcome (86.9% graft survival at 1 yr) with low incidence of delayed graft function.
1997
Bertoni, E., Carmellini, M., Bandini, S., Tosi, P., Zanazzi, M., Rosati, A., et al. (1997). Regional vs. national renal sharing organizations: pros and cons. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 11(3), 214-216.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
clintran.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 280.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
280.76 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/17690
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo