The organic production system is an important strategy, compatible with sustainable agriculture, avoiding the use of chemical compounds, limiting the intensity of production and providing controls along the entire chain of production. The aim of this study is to compare conventional and organic poultry production in terms of emergy analysis. The main differences in the two systems were the emergy cost for poultry feed and for cleaning/sanitization of the buildings between successive productive cycles. In both production systems the poultry feed represented more than 50% of the emergy flow. Regarding the agronomic phase, it was shown that almost all the organic crops, avoiding chemical fertilizers and pesticides, saved around 60% emergy. The emergetic costs for housing of the birds were very similar in both systems. Relating the emergy results with productive performance it is possible to show that, although the annual productive performance was much lower in organic than in conventional (-206%), transformity of organic poultry was around 10% lower. Comparison of the organic poultry system with a conventional one from the viewpoint of sustainability showed that all the emergy-based indicators are in favour of the organic farming system with a higher efficiency in transforming the available inputs in the final product, a higher level of renewable inputs, a higher level of local inputs and a lower density of energy and matter flows. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Castellini, C., Bastianoni, S., Granai, C., DAL BOSCO, A., & Brunetti, M. (2006). Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach: comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems. AGRICULTURE, ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 114(2-4), 343-350 [10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.014].

Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach: comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems

CASTELLINI, C.;BASTIANONI, S.;GRANAI, C.;BRUNETTI, M.
2006

Abstract

The organic production system is an important strategy, compatible with sustainable agriculture, avoiding the use of chemical compounds, limiting the intensity of production and providing controls along the entire chain of production. The aim of this study is to compare conventional and organic poultry production in terms of emergy analysis. The main differences in the two systems were the emergy cost for poultry feed and for cleaning/sanitization of the buildings between successive productive cycles. In both production systems the poultry feed represented more than 50% of the emergy flow. Regarding the agronomic phase, it was shown that almost all the organic crops, avoiding chemical fertilizers and pesticides, saved around 60% emergy. The emergetic costs for housing of the birds were very similar in both systems. Relating the emergy results with productive performance it is possible to show that, although the annual productive performance was much lower in organic than in conventional (-206%), transformity of organic poultry was around 10% lower. Comparison of the organic poultry system with a conventional one from the viewpoint of sustainability showed that all the emergy-based indicators are in favour of the organic farming system with a higher efficiency in transforming the available inputs in the final product, a higher level of renewable inputs, a higher level of local inputs and a lower density of energy and matter flows. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Castellini, C., Bastianoni, S., Granai, C., DAL BOSCO, A., & Brunetti, M. (2006). Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach: comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems. AGRICULTURE, ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 114(2-4), 343-350 [10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.014].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Castellini_et_al_Agriculture_Ecosystems_Environment_2006.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 128 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
128 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11365/17574
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo