The paper provides a comment on Richard Sturn's analysis of the heterogeneity of the History of Economic Thought discipline as well as his claim that governing principles, institutions, and norms that accommodate today's plurality of analytical approaches should ensure that the discipline's special relationship with economics remains central.
Zappia, C. (2026). Comment on Sturn’s ‘Variatio delectat’. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT, 33(4), 657-661 [10.1080/09672567.2026.2698465].
Comment on Sturn’s ‘Variatio delectat’
Zappia, Carlo
2026-01-01
Abstract
The paper provides a comment on Richard Sturn's analysis of the heterogeneity of the History of Economic Thought discipline as well as his claim that governing principles, institutions, and norms that accommodate today's plurality of analytical approaches should ensure that the discipline's special relationship with economics remains central.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento:
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1328194
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo