Lung Ultrasound (LUS) is increasingly used in prehospital emergency care for acute respiratory distress. By identifying artefacts such as B-lines, clinicians can rapidly differentiate “dry” from “wet” lung patterns to guide early treatment, although adoption in the field remains uneven. We conducted a narrative literature review to assess the usefulness of LUS for prehospital evaluation of respiratory distress. A secondary aim was to examine whether focused training on B-line detection improves patient management and limits early symptom progression. Sixteen articles were included. Overall, LUS showed high diagnostic performance for the differential diagnosis of dyspnoea. Using an eight-zone scan, the presence of ≥3 B-lines in at least two thoracic zones reached 94.2% sensitivity and 77.5% specificity for acute heart failure. LUS is rapid, non-invasive, and feasible in the field when performed by trained personnel; targeted education for paramedics and nurses improved diagnostic accuracy and shortened time to therapy in several studies. LUS is a useful, feasible tool for prehospital assessment and early management of acute respiratory distress. Structured theoretical–practical training and protocolised integration of LUS into prehospital pathways are recommended.
Fantini, S., Baglioni, E., Fabbri, L., Montemerani, S., Rosati, M., Righi, L. (2026). Prehospital lung ultrasound for acute dyspnoea: a narrative mini-review of diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and B-line-focused training. EMERGENCY CARE JOURNAL, 22, 36-40 [10.4081/ecj.2026.14443].
Prehospital lung ultrasound for acute dyspnoea: a narrative mini-review of diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and B-line-focused training
Righi, LorenzoMethodology
2026-01-01
Abstract
Lung Ultrasound (LUS) is increasingly used in prehospital emergency care for acute respiratory distress. By identifying artefacts such as B-lines, clinicians can rapidly differentiate “dry” from “wet” lung patterns to guide early treatment, although adoption in the field remains uneven. We conducted a narrative literature review to assess the usefulness of LUS for prehospital evaluation of respiratory distress. A secondary aim was to examine whether focused training on B-line detection improves patient management and limits early symptom progression. Sixteen articles were included. Overall, LUS showed high diagnostic performance for the differential diagnosis of dyspnoea. Using an eight-zone scan, the presence of ≥3 B-lines in at least two thoracic zones reached 94.2% sensitivity and 77.5% specificity for acute heart failure. LUS is rapid, non-invasive, and feasible in the field when performed by trained personnel; targeted education for paramedics and nurses improved diagnostic accuracy and shortened time to therapy in several studies. LUS is a useful, feasible tool for prehospital assessment and early management of acute respiratory distress. Structured theoretical–practical training and protocolised integration of LUS into prehospital pathways are recommended.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EMERGENCY CARE JOURNAL Prehospital lung ultrasound for acute dyspnoea.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
8.34 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
8.34 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
EMERGENCY CARE JOURNAL Supplemento.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Accepted Manuscript
Tipologia:
Post-print
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
581.66 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
581.66 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1312694
