Lung Ultrasound (LUS) is increasingly used in prehospital emergency care for acute respiratory distress. By identifying artefacts such as B-lines, clinicians can rapidly differentiate “dry” from “wet” lung patterns to guide early treatment, although adoption in the field remains uneven. We conducted a narrative literature review to assess the usefulness of LUS for prehospital evaluation of respiratory distress. A secondary aim was to examine whether focused training on B-line detection improves patient management and limits early symptom progression. Sixteen articles were included. Overall, LUS showed high diagnostic performance for the differential diagnosis of dyspnoea. Using an eight-zone scan, the presence of ≥3 B-lines in at least two thoracic zones reached 94.2% sensitivity and 77.5% specificity for acute heart failure. LUS is rapid, non-invasive, and feasible in the field when performed by trained personnel; targeted education for paramedics and nurses improved diagnostic accuracy and shortened time to therapy in several studies. LUS is a useful, feasible tool for prehospital assessment and early management of acute respiratory distress. Structured theoretical–practical training and protocolised integration of LUS into prehospital pathways are recommended.

Fantini, S., Baglioni, E., Fabbri, L., Montemerani, S., Rosati, M., Righi, L. (2026). Prehospital lung ultrasound for acute dyspnoea: a narrative mini-review of diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and B-line-focused training. EMERGENCY CARE JOURNAL, 22, 36-40 [10.4081/ecj.2026.14443].

Prehospital lung ultrasound for acute dyspnoea: a narrative mini-review of diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and B-line-focused training

Righi, Lorenzo
Methodology
2026-01-01

Abstract

Lung Ultrasound (LUS) is increasingly used in prehospital emergency care for acute respiratory distress. By identifying artefacts such as B-lines, clinicians can rapidly differentiate “dry” from “wet” lung patterns to guide early treatment, although adoption in the field remains uneven. We conducted a narrative literature review to assess the usefulness of LUS for prehospital evaluation of respiratory distress. A secondary aim was to examine whether focused training on B-line detection improves patient management and limits early symptom progression. Sixteen articles were included. Overall, LUS showed high diagnostic performance for the differential diagnosis of dyspnoea. Using an eight-zone scan, the presence of ≥3 B-lines in at least two thoracic zones reached 94.2% sensitivity and 77.5% specificity for acute heart failure. LUS is rapid, non-invasive, and feasible in the field when performed by trained personnel; targeted education for paramedics and nurses improved diagnostic accuracy and shortened time to therapy in several studies. LUS is a useful, feasible tool for prehospital assessment and early management of acute respiratory distress. Structured theoretical–practical training and protocolised integration of LUS into prehospital pathways are recommended.
2026
Fantini, S., Baglioni, E., Fabbri, L., Montemerani, S., Rosati, M., Righi, L. (2026). Prehospital lung ultrasound for acute dyspnoea: a narrative mini-review of diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and B-line-focused training. EMERGENCY CARE JOURNAL, 22, 36-40 [10.4081/ecj.2026.14443].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EMERGENCY CARE JOURNAL Prehospital lung ultrasound for acute dyspnoea.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 8.34 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.34 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
EMERGENCY CARE JOURNAL Supplemento.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Accepted Manuscript
Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 581.66 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
581.66 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1312694