The article explores Max Ernst’s early career interests (1919-1922) in Italian Renaissance art and particularly in Raphael’s and Michelangelo’s works and it reconsiders their fortune in the rising psychoanalytic literature and contemporary art historiography, within Ernst’s education as an art history student in Bonn. As for Ernst, old masters’ lesson is fostered in dialogue with Giorgio de Chirico’s metaphysical painting and his trust in d’après copying and ritorno al mestiere, as one can see in the “foundation painting” Au rendez-vous des amis (1922), in which both Raffaello and de Chirico are present. New approaches to dream activity and its visionary power question the mechanisms of language and test its resilience, amid absences, memories, desires, fears and impulses, that define not only original contents of poetics but also new political forms of expression at the origins of Surrealism, from overpaintings to photocollages. Thus, if de Chirico’s credit was in free fall soon after the publication of the 1924 manifesto, especially in the opinion of André Breton, it was Ernst who inherited and renewed the tradition of magic art over the centuries.
L’articolo approfondisce gli interessi di Max Ernst, agli inizi della sua carriera (1919-1922), per l’arte italiana del Rinascimento e in particolare per la produzione di Raffaello e Michelangelo e ne riconsidera la fortuna nella nascente letteratura psicoanalitica e nella coeva storiografia artistica, alla luce anche della formazione dell’artista come studente di storia dell’arte all’Università di Bonn. La lezione degli antichi maestri, in Ernst, trova un importante momento di maturazione nel confronto con la pittura metafisica di Giorgio de Chirico e con la sua apertura di credito nei confronti della copia d’après e del ritorno al mestiere, come è evidente nel ‘dipinto di fondazione’ Au rendez-vous des amis (1922), in cui compaiono sia Raffaello che de Chirico. Nuovi approcci all’attività onirica e alla sua potenza visionaria interrogano i meccanismi del linguaggio e ne verificano la tenuta, tra assenze, ricordi, desideri, paure e pulsioni, che definiscono non solo contenuti di poetica originali ma anche nuove forme politiche di espressione alle origini del Surrealismo, dagli overpaintings ai photocollages. Così, se il credito di de Chirico era ormai in caduta libera subito dopo la pubblicazione del manifesto del 1924, specie nell’opinione di André Breton, fu Ernst a ereditare e rinnovare la tradizione dell’arte magica di tutti i tempi.
Lacagnina, D. (2025). «Un delizioso caos in un cranio inquieto». Gli antichi maestri italiani e il giovane Max Ernst. LA DIANA(7-8, 2024), 173-197 [10.36253/ladiana-3390].
«Un delizioso caos in un cranio inquieto». Gli antichi maestri italiani e il giovane Max Ernst
Lacagnina, Davide
2025-01-01
Abstract
The article explores Max Ernst’s early career interests (1919-1922) in Italian Renaissance art and particularly in Raphael’s and Michelangelo’s works and it reconsiders their fortune in the rising psychoanalytic literature and contemporary art historiography, within Ernst’s education as an art history student in Bonn. As for Ernst, old masters’ lesson is fostered in dialogue with Giorgio de Chirico’s metaphysical painting and his trust in d’après copying and ritorno al mestiere, as one can see in the “foundation painting” Au rendez-vous des amis (1922), in which both Raffaello and de Chirico are present. New approaches to dream activity and its visionary power question the mechanisms of language and test its resilience, amid absences, memories, desires, fears and impulses, that define not only original contents of poetics but also new political forms of expression at the origins of Surrealism, from overpaintings to photocollages. Thus, if de Chirico’s credit was in free fall soon after the publication of the 1924 manifesto, especially in the opinion of André Breton, it was Ernst who inherited and renewed the tradition of magic art over the centuries.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
LaDiana7-8.Lacagnina.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
520.44 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
520.44 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1290754
