Condorcet exposed a limitation of majority-based pairwise comparison by showing that, for specific preference profiles over three alternatives, it leads to a contradiction. Arrow’s theorem is often introduced as a generalization of this finding. A novel formulation of the proof is presented that strictly adheres to this logic, establishing that for any non-dictatorial social choice rule, a contradiction-generating preference profile always exists and can be identified using a straightforward procedure.
D'Antoni, M. (2024). From Condorcet's paradox to Arrow: yet another simple proof of the impossibility theorem. SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 1-10 [10.1007/s00355-024-01557-8].
From Condorcet's paradox to Arrow: yet another simple proof of the impossibility theorem
Massimo D'Antoni
2024-01-01
Abstract
Condorcet exposed a limitation of majority-based pairwise comparison by showing that, for specific preference profiles over three alternatives, it leads to a contradiction. Arrow’s theorem is often introduced as a generalization of this finding. A novel formulation of the proof is presented that strictly adheres to this logic, establishing that for any non-dictatorial social choice rule, a contradiction-generating preference profile always exists and can be identified using a straightforward procedure.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2024,SCW,From Condorcet_s paradox to Arrow.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
335.34 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
335.34 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1280216