Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the sealing perfor-mance, expressed as microleakage (ML), of two root-end filling materials when used at different retro-preparation lengths. Methods: Fifty single-rooted human teeth were collected for the study. The teeth were cut at the cement-enamel junction and endodontic treatment was performed. Each root was cut at 3 mm from the apex and then stored in wet condition. The teeth were divided into three groups according to the retro-preparation length: control group (no retro-preparation); group 1 (retro-preparation of 3 mm); group 2 (retro-preparation of 9 mm). The teeth were equally allocated to either Biodentine or Super EBA treatment group. The teeth were immersed in 3% methylene blue dye solution for 24 h. The samples were split longitudinally and the depth of dye penetration was examined through light microscopy. Results: No significant statistical differences were found at different retro-preparation lengths (P > 0.05). Differences were found between materials (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Biodentine showed significantly lower ML when compared to Super-EBA and no statistical significative differences were observed when samples were retro-prepared at 3 mm or 9 mm.
Corsentino, G., Mazzitelli, C., Mazzoni, A., Ambu, E., Perotto, C., Franciosi, G., et al. (2022). Sealing ability of two root-end filling materials at different retro-preparation lengths. JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 64(1), 80-84 [10.2334/josnusd.21-0309].
Sealing ability of two root-end filling materials at different retro-preparation lengths
Corsentino G.
;Franciosi G.;Grandini S.
2022-01-01
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the sealing perfor-mance, expressed as microleakage (ML), of two root-end filling materials when used at different retro-preparation lengths. Methods: Fifty single-rooted human teeth were collected for the study. The teeth were cut at the cement-enamel junction and endodontic treatment was performed. Each root was cut at 3 mm from the apex and then stored in wet condition. The teeth were divided into three groups according to the retro-preparation length: control group (no retro-preparation); group 1 (retro-preparation of 3 mm); group 2 (retro-preparation of 9 mm). The teeth were equally allocated to either Biodentine or Super EBA treatment group. The teeth were immersed in 3% methylene blue dye solution for 24 h. The samples were split longitudinally and the depth of dye penetration was examined through light microscopy. Results: No significant statistical differences were found at different retro-preparation lengths (P > 0.05). Differences were found between materials (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Biodentine showed significantly lower ML when compared to Super-EBA and no statistical significative differences were observed when samples were retro-prepared at 3 mm or 9 mm.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
corsentino et al 2022.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: free full text sul sito dell'editore
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.11 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.11 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1278701