This study investigated the suitability of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis for routine multi-elemental composition analysis, checking its analytical capabilities by measuring a wide array of certified reference materials of soil and plant origin. A portable XRF analyzer was used to evaluate 32 soil and 12 plant standard materials, using both the Soil and Geochem mode, with sequential beams, allowing the detection of a wide range of elements. Recovery rates were calculated by comparing XRF measurements with certified values, and their correlations were verified through the Spearman coefficient. The results demonstrated the reliability of XRF measurements for soil samples, with a large number of elements showing a good or very good recovery and strong correlations with certified values. For plant samples, XRF largely overestimated the certified values, but the strong statistically significant correlations for almost all tested elements allowed us to correct this systematic bias, using the reported median value for dividing the value obtained via XRF. The Geochem mode emerged as more reliable for a larger number of elements. It was concluded that XRF may be a suitable alternative to ICP-MS in routine multi-elemental composition analysis.

Fedeli, R., Di Lella, L., Loppi, S. (2024). Suitability of XRF for Routine Analysis of Multi-Elemental Composition: A Multi-Standard Verification. METHODS AND PROTOCOLS, 7(4) [10.3390/mps7040053].

Suitability of XRF for Routine Analysis of Multi-Elemental Composition: A Multi-Standard Verification

Fedeli, Riccardo
;
Di Lella, Luigi;Loppi, Stefano
2024-01-01

Abstract

This study investigated the suitability of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis for routine multi-elemental composition analysis, checking its analytical capabilities by measuring a wide array of certified reference materials of soil and plant origin. A portable XRF analyzer was used to evaluate 32 soil and 12 plant standard materials, using both the Soil and Geochem mode, with sequential beams, allowing the detection of a wide range of elements. Recovery rates were calculated by comparing XRF measurements with certified values, and their correlations were verified through the Spearman coefficient. The results demonstrated the reliability of XRF measurements for soil samples, with a large number of elements showing a good or very good recovery and strong correlations with certified values. For plant samples, XRF largely overestimated the certified values, but the strong statistically significant correlations for almost all tested elements allowed us to correct this systematic bias, using the reported median value for dividing the value obtained via XRF. The Geochem mode emerged as more reliable for a larger number of elements. It was concluded that XRF may be a suitable alternative to ICP-MS in routine multi-elemental composition analysis.
2024
Fedeli, R., Di Lella, L., Loppi, S. (2024). Suitability of XRF for Routine Analysis of Multi-Elemental Composition: A Multi-Standard Verification. METHODS AND PROTOCOLS, 7(4) [10.3390/mps7040053].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
31-Suitability of XRF for Routine Analysis of Multi-Elemental.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 622.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
622.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1264996