Purpose – Building on the theoretical paradigms of consumer free-riding and cognitive dissonance, this study aims to evaluate whether consumers’ cognitive effort when making a purchase decision impacts upon the relationship between free-riding habits and postpurchase cognitive dissonance. Design/methodology/approach – To explore the relationship between cross-channel free-riding, cognitive efforts and cognitive dissonance, a framework was conceptualized and empirically tested on a sample of 518 Italian consumers. Covariance-based structural equation modeling and bootstrapped mediation analysis was performed with the PROCESS macro. Findings – Results show that the more cognitively involved a free-riding consumer is, the more he/she will experience postpurchase cognitive dissonance. Originality/value – Modern consumers habitually finalize their purchase activities through multiple different channels. The abundance of ecommerce/online platforms does indeed offer consumers a plethora of alternatives to physical/offline stores. Hence, consumers have been seen to act as “free-riders.” It is becoming more and more common for consumers to seek information in physical stores and then purchase a product online more conveniently. This notwithstanding, it has emerged that free-riding consumers tend to experience cognitive dissonance – which is a sensation of emotional discomfort – after making their purchases. The causes of this phenomenon are yet to be fully unpacked.
Nosi, C., Zollo, L., Rialti, R., Ciappei, C. (2022). Why do consumers free ride? Investigating the effects of cognitive effort on postpurchase dissonance. THE JOURNAL OF CONSUMER MARKETING, 39(5), 417-431 [10.1108/JCM-02-2021-4436].
Why do consumers free ride? Investigating the effects of cognitive effort on postpurchase dissonance
Rialti, Riccardo;
2022-01-01
Abstract
Purpose – Building on the theoretical paradigms of consumer free-riding and cognitive dissonance, this study aims to evaluate whether consumers’ cognitive effort when making a purchase decision impacts upon the relationship between free-riding habits and postpurchase cognitive dissonance. Design/methodology/approach – To explore the relationship between cross-channel free-riding, cognitive efforts and cognitive dissonance, a framework was conceptualized and empirically tested on a sample of 518 Italian consumers. Covariance-based structural equation modeling and bootstrapped mediation analysis was performed with the PROCESS macro. Findings – Results show that the more cognitively involved a free-riding consumer is, the more he/she will experience postpurchase cognitive dissonance. Originality/value – Modern consumers habitually finalize their purchase activities through multiple different channels. The abundance of ecommerce/online platforms does indeed offer consumers a plethora of alternatives to physical/offline stores. Hence, consumers have been seen to act as “free-riders.” It is becoming more and more common for consumers to seek information in physical stores and then purchase a product online more conveniently. This notwithstanding, it has emerged that free-riding consumers tend to experience cognitive dissonance – which is a sensation of emotional discomfort – after making their purchases. The causes of this phenomenon are yet to be fully unpacked.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
JCM - Nosi, Rialti, Zollo, Ciappei.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pre-print
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
542.7 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
542.7 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
10-1108_JCM-02-2021-4436.pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
361.46 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
361.46 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1259405