Parental hesitancy poses a serious threat to the success of the COVID-19 childhood vaccination campaign. We investigate whether adults' opinions on childhood vaccination can be influenced via two survey experiments in Italy (n = 3,633 participants) and the UK (n = 3,314 participants). Respondents were randomly assigned to: a “risk treatment” that highlighted the potential risks of COVID-19 to a child, a “herd immunity treatment” that emphasized the community benefits of pediatric vaccination, or a control message. Participants’ probability of supporting COVID-19 childhood vaccination was then assessed on a 0–100 scale. We find that the “risk treatment” reduced the proportion of Italian parents strongly against vaccination by up to 29.6 %, while increasing the proportion of neutral parents by up to 45.0 %. The “herd immunity treatment”, instead, was only effective among non-parents, resulting in a lower proportion of individuals against pediatric vaccination and a higher proportion of individuals in favor (both shifted by around 20 %).

Chiavenna, C., Leone, L.P., Melegaro, A., Rotesi, T., Bokemper, S.E., Paintsil, E.E., et al. (2023). Personal risk or societal benefit? Investigating adults’ support for COVID-19 childhood vaccination. VACCINE, 41(25), 3683-3687 [10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.017].

Personal risk or societal benefit? Investigating adults’ support for COVID-19 childhood vaccination

Paolo Pin
2023-01-01

Abstract

Parental hesitancy poses a serious threat to the success of the COVID-19 childhood vaccination campaign. We investigate whether adults' opinions on childhood vaccination can be influenced via two survey experiments in Italy (n = 3,633 participants) and the UK (n = 3,314 participants). Respondents were randomly assigned to: a “risk treatment” that highlighted the potential risks of COVID-19 to a child, a “herd immunity treatment” that emphasized the community benefits of pediatric vaccination, or a control message. Participants’ probability of supporting COVID-19 childhood vaccination was then assessed on a 0–100 scale. We find that the “risk treatment” reduced the proportion of Italian parents strongly against vaccination by up to 29.6 %, while increasing the proportion of neutral parents by up to 45.0 %. The “herd immunity treatment”, instead, was only effective among non-parents, resulting in a lower proportion of individuals against pediatric vaccination and a higher proportion of individuals in favor (both shifted by around 20 %).
2023
Chiavenna, C., Leone, L.P., Melegaro, A., Rotesi, T., Bokemper, S.E., Paintsil, E.E., et al. (2023). Personal risk or societal benefit? Investigating adults’ support for COVID-19 childhood vaccination. VACCINE, 41(25), 3683-3687 [10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.017].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Vaccine23.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.09 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.09 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1235874