One of the conventional and commonly accepted assumption in the financial world is the Efficient Market Hypothesis (Fama, 1970). However, the intellectual dominance of the efficient-market revolution has more been challenged by economists who stress psychological and behavioral elements of stock-price determination and by econometricians who argue that stock returns are, to a considerable extent, predictable (Malkiel, 2003). “Boom-bust” patterns are the empirical evidence of the efficient market nonsense. We suggest a theoretical linkage between the EMH and the Reflexivity Theory focusing mainly on the psychological profile. We suppose that, during stages of market exuberance/panic, the market pricing produces “gaslighting effects” and that mean-reverting behavior (i.e., contrarianism) is the result of participants’ awareness of psychological deviation from reality. We suspect that investors “benchmarking” plays a primary role on this latter aspect. Outside bubbles episodes, the market pricing is generally efficient and reflects the fundamental value evolution, without producing gaslighting effects.

Anelli, M., Patanè, M. (2023). The “Perpetually” Efficient Stock Market Nonsense: The Gaslighting Effects. JOURNAL OF FINANCE AND INVESTMENT ANALYSIS, 12(2), 1-10 [10.47260/jfia/1221].

The “Perpetually” Efficient Stock Market Nonsense: The Gaslighting Effects

Michele Patanè
2023-01-01

Abstract

One of the conventional and commonly accepted assumption in the financial world is the Efficient Market Hypothesis (Fama, 1970). However, the intellectual dominance of the efficient-market revolution has more been challenged by economists who stress psychological and behavioral elements of stock-price determination and by econometricians who argue that stock returns are, to a considerable extent, predictable (Malkiel, 2003). “Boom-bust” patterns are the empirical evidence of the efficient market nonsense. We suggest a theoretical linkage between the EMH and the Reflexivity Theory focusing mainly on the psychological profile. We suppose that, during stages of market exuberance/panic, the market pricing produces “gaslighting effects” and that mean-reverting behavior (i.e., contrarianism) is the result of participants’ awareness of psychological deviation from reality. We suspect that investors “benchmarking” plays a primary role on this latter aspect. Outside bubbles episodes, the market pricing is generally efficient and reflects the fundamental value evolution, without producing gaslighting effects.
2023
Anelli, M., Patanè, M. (2023). The “Perpetually” Efficient Stock Market Nonsense: The Gaslighting Effects. JOURNAL OF FINANCE AND INVESTMENT ANALYSIS, 12(2), 1-10 [10.47260/jfia/1221].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Vol 12_2_1 Patane.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 253.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
253.65 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1232175