Purpose: To compare the fracture resistance and failure patterns of endodontically-treated teeth with a progressively reduced number of residual walls restored using resin composites, with or without translucent glass fiber posts. Methods: Ninety extracted human single-rooted maxillary premolars were used. After endodontic treatment, the following groups were created: Group 1 (control group): endodontically-treated single-rooted maxillary premolars with four residual walls; Group 2: three residual walls; Group 3: two residual walls; Group 4: one residual wall, and Group 5: no residual wall. Groups 2-5 were each divided into two subgroups: subgroups "a" were restored with resin composites, while subgroups "b" were restored with translucent glass fiber posts and resin composites. Static fracture resistance tests and statistical analyses (P= 0.05) were performed. Results: The mean failure loads (N) were 502.4 +/- 152.5 (Group 1), 416.4 +/- 122.2 (Group 2a), 423.0 +/- 103.3 (Group 2b) 422.1 +/- 138.9 (Group 3a) 513.2 +/- 121.7 (Group 3b), 488.7 +/- 153.7 (Group 4a) 573.4 +/- 169.2 (Group 4b), 856.7 +/- 112.2 (Group 5a) and 649.5 +/- 163.5 (Group 5b), respectively. The samples restored with fiber posts exhibited predominantly restorable fractures. The number of residual cavity walls influenced the mechanical resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.

Sorrentino, R., Monticelli, F., Goracci, C., Zarone, F., Tay, F.R., GARCÍA-GODOY, F., et al. (2007). Effect of post-retained composite restorations and amount of coronal residual structure on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 20(4), 269-274.

Effect of post-retained composite restorations and amount of coronal residual structure on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth

GORACCI C.;FERRARI M.
2007-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the fracture resistance and failure patterns of endodontically-treated teeth with a progressively reduced number of residual walls restored using resin composites, with or without translucent glass fiber posts. Methods: Ninety extracted human single-rooted maxillary premolars were used. After endodontic treatment, the following groups were created: Group 1 (control group): endodontically-treated single-rooted maxillary premolars with four residual walls; Group 2: three residual walls; Group 3: two residual walls; Group 4: one residual wall, and Group 5: no residual wall. Groups 2-5 were each divided into two subgroups: subgroups "a" were restored with resin composites, while subgroups "b" were restored with translucent glass fiber posts and resin composites. Static fracture resistance tests and statistical analyses (P= 0.05) were performed. Results: The mean failure loads (N) were 502.4 +/- 152.5 (Group 1), 416.4 +/- 122.2 (Group 2a), 423.0 +/- 103.3 (Group 2b) 422.1 +/- 138.9 (Group 3a) 513.2 +/- 121.7 (Group 3b), 488.7 +/- 153.7 (Group 4a) 573.4 +/- 169.2 (Group 4b), 856.7 +/- 112.2 (Group 5a) and 649.5 +/- 163.5 (Group 5b), respectively. The samples restored with fiber posts exhibited predominantly restorable fractures. The number of residual cavity walls influenced the mechanical resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.
2007
Sorrentino, R., Monticelli, F., Goracci, C., Zarone, F., Tay, F.R., GARCÍA-GODOY, F., et al. (2007). Effect of post-retained composite restorations and amount of coronal residual structure on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 20(4), 269-274.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
American Journal of Dentistry 2007 Sorrentino - Post retention amount residual crown.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 5.18 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.18 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/12079
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo