Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of the T-score values provided by Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) in the identification of patients at risk for incident osteoporotic fractures. Methods: A population of Caucasian women (30–90 years), enrolled from 2013 to 2016, underwent dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and REMS scans at axial sites. The incidence of fragility fractures was assessed during a follow-up period up to 5 years. Afterwards, patients with and without incident fractures were stratified in two age-matched groups with a 1: 2 proportion (Group F’ and Group NF’, respectively). The performance of REMS T-score in discriminating between the two groups was quantitatively assessed and compared with DXA. Results: 1516 patients were enrolled and 1370 completed the follow-up (mean ± SD: 3.7 ± 0.8 years; range: 1.9–5.0 years). Fracture incidence was 14.0%. Age-matched groups included 175 fractured patients and 350 non-fractured ones, respectively (median age 70.2 [interquartile range: 61.0–73.3] and 67.3 [65.4–69.8] years, p-value ns). The groups resulted also balanced for height, weight and BMI (p-values ns). As expected, the differences in REMS T-score (for vertebral site, −2.9 [−3.6 to −1.9] in Group F’, −2.2 [−2.9 to −1.2] in Group NF’) and DXA T-score (−2.8 [−3.3 to −1.9] in Group F’, −2.2 [−2.9 to −1.4] in Group NF’) were statistically significant (p-value <0.001). Analogous results were obtained for femoral neck. Considering the T-score cut-off of −2.5, REMS identified Group F’ patients with a sensitivity of 65.1% and specificity of 57.7% of (OR = 2.6, 95%CI: 1.77–3.76, p < 0.001), whereas DXA showed a sensitivity of 57.1% and a specificity of 56.3% (OR = 1.7, 95%CI: 1.20–2.51, p-value = 0.0032). For femoral neck, REMS sensitivity and specificity were 40.2% and 79.9%, respectively, with an OR of 2.81 (95%CI: 1.80–4.39, p < 0.001). DXA, instead, showed a sensitivity and specificity of 42.3% and 79.3%, respectively, with an OR of 2.68 (95%CI: 1.71–4.21, p < 0.001). Conclusions: REMS T-score resulted an effective predictor for the risk of incident fragility fractures in a population-based sample of female subjects, representing a promising parameter to enhance osteoporosis diagnosis in the clinical routine.
Adami, G., Arioli, G., Bianchi, G., Brandi, M.L., Caffarelli, C., Cianferotti, L., et al. (2020). Radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry for the prediction of incident fragility fractures: A 5-year follow-up study. BONE, 134 [10.1016/j.bone.2020.115297].
Radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry for the prediction of incident fragility fractures: A 5-year follow-up study
Caffarelli C.;Gonnelli S.;
2020-01-01
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of the T-score values provided by Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) in the identification of patients at risk for incident osteoporotic fractures. Methods: A population of Caucasian women (30–90 years), enrolled from 2013 to 2016, underwent dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and REMS scans at axial sites. The incidence of fragility fractures was assessed during a follow-up period up to 5 years. Afterwards, patients with and without incident fractures were stratified in two age-matched groups with a 1: 2 proportion (Group F’ and Group NF’, respectively). The performance of REMS T-score in discriminating between the two groups was quantitatively assessed and compared with DXA. Results: 1516 patients were enrolled and 1370 completed the follow-up (mean ± SD: 3.7 ± 0.8 years; range: 1.9–5.0 years). Fracture incidence was 14.0%. Age-matched groups included 175 fractured patients and 350 non-fractured ones, respectively (median age 70.2 [interquartile range: 61.0–73.3] and 67.3 [65.4–69.8] years, p-value ns). The groups resulted also balanced for height, weight and BMI (p-values ns). As expected, the differences in REMS T-score (for vertebral site, −2.9 [−3.6 to −1.9] in Group F’, −2.2 [−2.9 to −1.2] in Group NF’) and DXA T-score (−2.8 [−3.3 to −1.9] in Group F’, −2.2 [−2.9 to −1.4] in Group NF’) were statistically significant (p-value <0.001). Analogous results were obtained for femoral neck. Considering the T-score cut-off of −2.5, REMS identified Group F’ patients with a sensitivity of 65.1% and specificity of 57.7% of (OR = 2.6, 95%CI: 1.77–3.76, p < 0.001), whereas DXA showed a sensitivity of 57.1% and a specificity of 56.3% (OR = 1.7, 95%CI: 1.20–2.51, p-value = 0.0032). For femoral neck, REMS sensitivity and specificity were 40.2% and 79.9%, respectively, with an OR of 2.81 (95%CI: 1.80–4.39, p < 0.001). DXA, instead, showed a sensitivity and specificity of 42.3% and 79.3%, respectively, with an OR of 2.68 (95%CI: 1.71–4.21, p < 0.001). Conclusions: REMS T-score resulted an effective predictor for the risk of incident fragility fractures in a population-based sample of female subjects, representing a promising parameter to enhance osteoporosis diagnosis in the clinical routine.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2020 Bone REMS Fx.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.26 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.26 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1198581