Alternative splicing (AS) is a crucial process to enhance gene expression driving organ-ism development. Interestingly, more than 95% of human genes undergo AS, producing multiple protein isoforms from the same transcript. Any alteration (e.g., nucleotide substitutions, insertions, and deletions) involving consensus splicing regulatory sequences in a specific gene may result in the production of aberrant and not properly working proteins. In this review, we introduce the key steps of splicing mechanism and describe all different types of genomic variants affecting this process (splicing variants in acceptor/donor sites or branch point or polypyrimidine tract, exonic, and deep intronic changes). Then, we provide an updated approach to improve splice variants detection. First, we review the main computational tools, including the recent Machine Learn-ing-based algorithms, for the prediction of splice site variants, in order to characterize how a genomic variant interferes with splicing process. Next, we report the experimental methods to vali-date the predictive analyses are defined, distinguishing between methods testing RNA (tran-scriptomics analysis) or proteins (proteomics experiments). For both prediction and validation steps, benefits and weaknesses of each tool/procedure are accurately reported, as well as sugges-tions on which approaches are more suitable in diagnostic rather than in clinical research. © 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Riolo, G., Cantara, S., Ricci, C. (2021). What's Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants. METHODS AND PROTOCOLS, 4(3) [10.3390/mps4030062].

What's Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants

Cantara S.;Ricci C.
2021-01-01

Abstract

Alternative splicing (AS) is a crucial process to enhance gene expression driving organ-ism development. Interestingly, more than 95% of human genes undergo AS, producing multiple protein isoforms from the same transcript. Any alteration (e.g., nucleotide substitutions, insertions, and deletions) involving consensus splicing regulatory sequences in a specific gene may result in the production of aberrant and not properly working proteins. In this review, we introduce the key steps of splicing mechanism and describe all different types of genomic variants affecting this process (splicing variants in acceptor/donor sites or branch point or polypyrimidine tract, exonic, and deep intronic changes). Then, we provide an updated approach to improve splice variants detection. First, we review the main computational tools, including the recent Machine Learn-ing-based algorithms, for the prediction of splice site variants, in order to characterize how a genomic variant interferes with splicing process. Next, we report the experimental methods to vali-date the predictive analyses are defined, distinguishing between methods testing RNA (tran-scriptomics analysis) or proteins (proteomics experiments). For both prediction and validation steps, benefits and weaknesses of each tool/procedure are accurately reported, as well as sugges-tions on which approaches are more suitable in diagnostic rather than in clinical research. © 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
2021
Riolo, G., Cantara, S., Ricci, C. (2021). What's Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants. METHODS AND PROTOCOLS, 4(3) [10.3390/mps4030062].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
mps-04-00062.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.06 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1182463