Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in selected patients with a severe carotid stenosis. Long-term patency following CAS can be limited by restenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia or recurrent atherosclerosis. CAS patients require intensive follow-up to monitor the patency of the device and the potential development of an in-stent restenosis (ISR), which continues to be the "Achilles' heel" of any catheter intervention.ISR after CAS is now considered to have a lower incidence in comparison to other vascular distrticts. The literature reported a progressive reduction of the incidence of carotid ISR by the years, from 15% to the actual 1-3%/year. Long-term results hi several published cohort of patients in literature seems to validate CAS as a durable procedure for stroke prevention. The ISR rate appears to be acceptable, and the need for reintervention is low. There are several putative causes of re-stenosis after CAS, but the literature is not conclusive about true predictors of ISR. A rigorous duplex ultrasound follow-up of CAS with corrected velocity criteria is mandatory to early recognize any kind of late complications. In-stent restenotic carotid lesions may be safely treated by further percutaneous interventions.

Setacci, C., De Donato, G., Chisci, E., Setacci, F., Sirignano, P., Galzerano, G., et al. (2008). In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 15(3), 171-178.

In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting

Setacci C.;De Donato G.;Galzerano G.;Cappelli A.;Palasciano G.
2008-01-01

Abstract

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in selected patients with a severe carotid stenosis. Long-term patency following CAS can be limited by restenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia or recurrent atherosclerosis. CAS patients require intensive follow-up to monitor the patency of the device and the potential development of an in-stent restenosis (ISR), which continues to be the "Achilles' heel" of any catheter intervention.ISR after CAS is now considered to have a lower incidence in comparison to other vascular distrticts. The literature reported a progressive reduction of the incidence of carotid ISR by the years, from 15% to the actual 1-3%/year. Long-term results hi several published cohort of patients in literature seems to validate CAS as a durable procedure for stroke prevention. The ISR rate appears to be acceptable, and the need for reintervention is low. There are several putative causes of re-stenosis after CAS, but the literature is not conclusive about true predictors of ISR. A rigorous duplex ultrasound follow-up of CAS with corrected velocity criteria is mandatory to early recognize any kind of late complications. In-stent restenotic carotid lesions may be safely treated by further percutaneous interventions.
2008
Setacci, C., De Donato, G., Chisci, E., Setacci, F., Sirignano, P., Galzerano, G., et al. (2008). In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 15(3), 171-178.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1142949