In 2007 the EC introduced pre-commercial procurement (PCP) to endow the EU public sector with a legal instrument for procuring innovative solutions, unavailable in the market. To induce firms to participate in a PCP, the EC suggests contracting authorities to leave the intellectual property rights (IPR) of the new solution with the firms. Based on the perspective of a possible commercial success, the IPR should work as a major incentive for companies to engage in a PCP. As important as the EC seems to consider the IPR, for a successful PCP, so far no guidelines have been provided on how to estimate their economic value. This paper proposes a methodology for such evaluation, discussing its advantages and limitations. A main message of the paper is that IPR economic value should be based on the expected profits coming from commercialisation of the would-be innovative solution. Moreover, the value should change across the different development phases of the PCP. The findings could be useful for a broad audience of PCP potential participant
Dimitri, N. (2020). Intellectual property rights in the EU pre-commercial procurement for innovation. JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC CONTRACTING AND NEGOTIATION, 4(3), 186-199 [10.1177/2055563620932895].
Intellectual property rights in the EU pre-commercial procurement for innovation
Nicola Dimitri
2020-01-01
Abstract
In 2007 the EC introduced pre-commercial procurement (PCP) to endow the EU public sector with a legal instrument for procuring innovative solutions, unavailable in the market. To induce firms to participate in a PCP, the EC suggests contracting authorities to leave the intellectual property rights (IPR) of the new solution with the firms. Based on the perspective of a possible commercial success, the IPR should work as a major incentive for companies to engage in a PCP. As important as the EC seems to consider the IPR, for a successful PCP, so far no guidelines have been provided on how to estimate their economic value. This paper proposes a methodology for such evaluation, discussing its advantages and limitations. A main message of the paper is that IPR economic value should be based on the expected profits coming from commercialisation of the would-be innovative solution. Moreover, the value should change across the different development phases of the PCP. The findings could be useful for a broad audience of PCP potential participantFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Dimitri JSCAN.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
279.27 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
279.27 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1117935