We study the optimal referral strategy of a seller and its relationship with the type of communication channels among consumers. The seller faces a partially uninformed population of consumers, interconnected through a directed social network. In the network, the seller oers rewards to informed consumers (in uencers) conditional on inducing purchases by uninformed consumers (influenced). Rewards are needed to bear a communication cost and to induce word-of-mouth (WOM) either privately (cost-percontact) or publicly (xed cost to inform all friends). From the seller's viewpoint, eliciting Private WOM is more costly than eliciting Public WOM. We investigate (i) the incentives for the seller to move to a denser network, inducing either Private or Public WOM and (ii) the optimal mix between the two types of communication. A denser network is found to be always better, not only for information diusion but also for seller's prots, as long as Private WOM is concerned. Dierently, under Public WOM, the seller may prefer an environment with less competition between informed consumers and the presence of highly connected in uencers (hubs) is the main driver to make network density benecial to prots. When the seller is able to discriminate between Private and Public WOM, the optimal strategy is to cheaply incentivize the more connected people to pass on the information publicly and then oer a high bonus for Private WOM.
Carroni, E., Pin, P., Righi, S. (2020). Bring a friend! Privately or publicly?. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 66(5), 2269-2290 [10.1287/mnsc.2018.3282].
Bring a friend! Privately or publicly?
Pin, Paolo
;
2020-01-01
Abstract
We study the optimal referral strategy of a seller and its relationship with the type of communication channels among consumers. The seller faces a partially uninformed population of consumers, interconnected through a directed social network. In the network, the seller oers rewards to informed consumers (in uencers) conditional on inducing purchases by uninformed consumers (influenced). Rewards are needed to bear a communication cost and to induce word-of-mouth (WOM) either privately (cost-percontact) or publicly (xed cost to inform all friends). From the seller's viewpoint, eliciting Private WOM is more costly than eliciting Public WOM. We investigate (i) the incentives for the seller to move to a denser network, inducing either Private or Public WOM and (ii) the optimal mix between the two types of communication. A denser network is found to be always better, not only for information diusion but also for seller's prots, as long as Private WOM is concerned. Dierently, under Public WOM, the seller may prefer an environment with less competition between informed consumers and the presence of highly connected in uencers (hubs) is the main driver to make network density benecial to prots. When the seller is able to discriminate between Private and Public WOM, the optimal strategy is to cheaply incentivize the more connected people to pass on the information publicly and then oer a high bonus for Private WOM.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
mnsc.2018.3282.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.34 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.34 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1092856