We investigated the effect of cervical marginal relocation (CMR) on marginal sealing with two different viscosity resin composites, before adhesive cementation of composite computer-aided design/ computer-assisted manufacture mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) overlays. StandardizedMOD cavities prepared in 39 human molars were randomly assigned to three groups. The proximal margins on the mesial side were located 1 mm below the cementoenamel junction. On the distal side of the tooth, the margins were located 1 mm above the cementoenamel junction. In Groups 1 and 2, mesial proximal boxes were elevated with a hybrid composite (GC Essentia MD) and a flowable composite (GC G-ænial Universal Flo), respectively. CMR was not performed in Group 3. The overlays were adhesively cemented, and interfacial leakage was quantified by scoring the depth of silver nitrate penetration along the adhesive interfaces. Leakage score at the dentin-CMR composite interface did not significantly differ between the two tested composites but was significantly lower for Group 3. In all groups, scores were significantly higher at the dentin interface than at the enamel interface. These results indicate that the performance of flowable and microhybrid resin composites, as indicated by marginal sealing ability, is comparable for CMR.
Koken, S., Juloski, J., Sorrentino, R., Grandini, S., Ferrari, M. (2018). Marginal sealing of relocated cervical margins of mesio-occluso-distal overlays. JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 60(3), 460-468 [10.2334/josnusd.17-0331].
Marginal sealing of relocated cervical margins of mesio-occluso-distal overlays
KOKEN, SERHAT;Juloski J.;Grandini S.;Ferrari M.
2018-01-01
Abstract
We investigated the effect of cervical marginal relocation (CMR) on marginal sealing with two different viscosity resin composites, before adhesive cementation of composite computer-aided design/ computer-assisted manufacture mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) overlays. StandardizedMOD cavities prepared in 39 human molars were randomly assigned to three groups. The proximal margins on the mesial side were located 1 mm below the cementoenamel junction. On the distal side of the tooth, the margins were located 1 mm above the cementoenamel junction. In Groups 1 and 2, mesial proximal boxes were elevated with a hybrid composite (GC Essentia MD) and a flowable composite (GC G-ænial Universal Flo), respectively. CMR was not performed in Group 3. The overlays were adhesively cemented, and interfacial leakage was quantified by scoring the depth of silver nitrate penetration along the adhesive interfaces. Leakage score at the dentin-CMR composite interface did not significantly differ between the two tested composites but was significantly lower for Group 3. In all groups, scores were significantly higher at the dentin interface than at the enamel interface. These results indicate that the performance of flowable and microhybrid resin composites, as indicated by marginal sealing ability, is comparable for CMR.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Marginal sealing of relocated-Koken-2018.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
1.6 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.6 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1088000