One of the issues highlighted by the scholars in criminological literature about “fear of crime” and “unsafety” is the lack of attention paid to the quality of the measures used.This work describes the process of validation of a scale measuring perceived urban safety. Starting from the main theoretical frameworks, validation was carried out in Italy across several stages, using exploratory factor analyses and structural equation modelling. Convergent validity was studied and reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s Alpha and a test-retest analysis. The final model is based on 3 dimensions and 27 items. Fit indexes are satisfactory (CMIN/DF=1,271; RMSEA=0,026) and also reliability present good values.The assessment tool named PUSAS (Perceived Urban Safety Assessment Scale) shows good psychometric qualities, although further research is needed in order to verify the invariance.

Ferretti, F., Coluccia, A., Lorenzi, L., Gusinu, R., Pozza, A. (2019). La perceived urban safety assessment scale: uno strumento per la misurazione multidimensionale dell’insicurezza [The perceived urban safety assessment scale: A tool for the multidimensional measurement of unsafety]. RASSEGNA ITALIANA DI CRIMINOLOGIA, 13(1), 39-48 [10.7347/RIC-012019-p39].

La perceived urban safety assessment scale: uno strumento per la misurazione multidimensionale dell’insicurezza [The perceived urban safety assessment scale: A tool for the multidimensional measurement of unsafety]

Fabio Ferretti
;
Anna Coluccia
;
Lore Lorenzi
;
Andrea Pozza
2019-01-01

Abstract

One of the issues highlighted by the scholars in criminological literature about “fear of crime” and “unsafety” is the lack of attention paid to the quality of the measures used.This work describes the process of validation of a scale measuring perceived urban safety. Starting from the main theoretical frameworks, validation was carried out in Italy across several stages, using exploratory factor analyses and structural equation modelling. Convergent validity was studied and reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s Alpha and a test-retest analysis. The final model is based on 3 dimensions and 27 items. Fit indexes are satisfactory (CMIN/DF=1,271; RMSEA=0,026) and also reliability present good values.The assessment tool named PUSAS (Perceived Urban Safety Assessment Scale) shows good psychometric qualities, although further research is needed in order to verify the invariance.
2019
Ferretti, F., Coluccia, A., Lorenzi, L., Gusinu, R., Pozza, A. (2019). La perceived urban safety assessment scale: uno strumento per la misurazione multidimensionale dell’insicurezza [The perceived urban safety assessment scale: A tool for the multidimensional measurement of unsafety]. RASSEGNA ITALIANA DI CRIMINOLOGIA, 13(1), 39-48 [10.7347/RIC-012019-p39].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1072477