Over the past few years one of the most important concepts that emerged in the area of gut immunology derived from the observation by Rescigno et al.1 on the ability of intestinal dendritic cells (DCs) to extend cellular extensions between epithelial cells into the intestinal lumen, to internalize bacteria and shuttle them across the epithelial barrier. This sophisticated mechanism for antigen-sampling complements the well-studied M-cell-mediated transport of particulate antigen and bacteria.2 We have recently reported that DC-mediated sampling is not the only event taking place at the host–pathogen interface in the small intestine during the early stage of bacterial infection. Indeed, a proportion of DCs that rapidly migrate to the lamina propria following challenge with non-invasive Salmonella lacking the Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 (SPI1) did not act as an antigen-sampling cell but crossed the epithelium and moved into the gut lumen (Figure 1) before or following internalization of Salmonella.3 The migration of CD11c+CX3CR1+MHCII+CD11b-CD8-DCs was found to be flagellin- and MyD88-dependent, it was restricted to the small intestine and it was not observed in MyD88 mice. Interestingly, intraluminal DCs internalized Salmonella but did not cross the epithelium to return into the tissue. The finding that DCs migrate into the gut lumen following a challenge with a pathogen suggests a few observations. First, it appears that the same antigenic stimulus (e.g., non-invasive Salmonella) can induce DCs to either sample or to migrate into the gut lumen thus showing the complexity of the signaling network operating at the host–pathogen interface; second it tells us that many of the intraepithelial DC extensions previously considered to be "sampling" devices are a feature of DCs undergoing transepithelial migration. At this time the role of the intraluminal "bacteria-capturing" DCs remains to be determined. The migration of phagocytes into the gut lumen was described in the past and it was interpreted as a mechanism of cellular control of the gut pathogens;4, 5 thus, it is possible to hypothesize that DCs are also part of a similar defence mechanism. Sending phagocytes, including DCs, into the lumen of the small intestine would possibly help to limit the number of pathogens that can cross the epithelial barrier and infect the host; a strategy that would complement the immune exclusion mediated by mucous and sIgA antibody

Nicoletti, C., Regoli, M., Bertelli, E. (2009). Dendritic cells in the gut: to sample and to exclude?. MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2(5), 462-462 [10.1038/mi.2009.92].

Dendritic cells in the gut: to sample and to exclude?

NICOLETTI, Claudio;REGOLI, MARI';BERTELLI, EUGENIO
2009-01-01

Abstract

Over the past few years one of the most important concepts that emerged in the area of gut immunology derived from the observation by Rescigno et al.1 on the ability of intestinal dendritic cells (DCs) to extend cellular extensions between epithelial cells into the intestinal lumen, to internalize bacteria and shuttle them across the epithelial barrier. This sophisticated mechanism for antigen-sampling complements the well-studied M-cell-mediated transport of particulate antigen and bacteria.2 We have recently reported that DC-mediated sampling is not the only event taking place at the host–pathogen interface in the small intestine during the early stage of bacterial infection. Indeed, a proportion of DCs that rapidly migrate to the lamina propria following challenge with non-invasive Salmonella lacking the Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 (SPI1) did not act as an antigen-sampling cell but crossed the epithelium and moved into the gut lumen (Figure 1) before or following internalization of Salmonella.3 The migration of CD11c+CX3CR1+MHCII+CD11b-CD8-DCs was found to be flagellin- and MyD88-dependent, it was restricted to the small intestine and it was not observed in MyD88 mice. Interestingly, intraluminal DCs internalized Salmonella but did not cross the epithelium to return into the tissue. The finding that DCs migrate into the gut lumen following a challenge with a pathogen suggests a few observations. First, it appears that the same antigenic stimulus (e.g., non-invasive Salmonella) can induce DCs to either sample or to migrate into the gut lumen thus showing the complexity of the signaling network operating at the host–pathogen interface; second it tells us that many of the intraepithelial DC extensions previously considered to be "sampling" devices are a feature of DCs undergoing transepithelial migration. At this time the role of the intraluminal "bacteria-capturing" DCs remains to be determined. The migration of phagocytes into the gut lumen was described in the past and it was interpreted as a mechanism of cellular control of the gut pathogens;4, 5 thus, it is possible to hypothesize that DCs are also part of a similar defence mechanism. Sending phagocytes, including DCs, into the lumen of the small intestine would possibly help to limit the number of pathogens that can cross the epithelial barrier and infect the host; a strategy that would complement the immune exclusion mediated by mucous and sIgA antibody
2009
Nicoletti, C., Regoli, M., Bertelli, E. (2009). Dendritic cells in the gut: to sample and to exclude?. MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2(5), 462-462 [10.1038/mi.2009.92].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
mi200992a.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 90.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
90.25 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/10719
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo