The building of the Apennine belt slowed down or ceased around the Early Pleistocene. Since then, the belt has undergone strong uplift and considerable distortion. This change, from belt-normal to belt-parallel shortening, has been determined by the fact that the continental Adriatic domain (Adria) was almost completely surrounded by buoyant orogenic structures. In that context, the mobility of Adria underwent a considerable reduction, whereas uplift and deformation of its southern part was strongly emphasized as an effect of the convergence of the confining plates. Around the middle Pleistocene, the deformation pattern in the peri-Adriatic zones changed again, in response to acceleration of Adria. The outer (Adriatic) sector of the Apennine belt underwent belt-parallel shortening, accommodated by uplift and outward escape of upper crustal wedges. The separation between the extruding wedges and the almost stable inner belt has generated a series of extensional or transtensional fault systems along the axial part of the Apennines, which now correspond to the main seismogenic sources. The spatio-temporal distribution of major tectonic events in the study area can plausibly be explained as an effect of the least-action principle.

Mantovani, E., Viti, M., Babbucci, D., Tamburelli, C., Cenni, N. (2019). How and why the present tectonic setting in the Apennine belt has developed. JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 176(6), 1291-1302 [10.1144/jgs2018-175].

How and why the present tectonic setting in the Apennine belt has developed

Mantovani, E.;Viti, M.;Babbucci, D.;Tamburelli, C.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

The building of the Apennine belt slowed down or ceased around the Early Pleistocene. Since then, the belt has undergone strong uplift and considerable distortion. This change, from belt-normal to belt-parallel shortening, has been determined by the fact that the continental Adriatic domain (Adria) was almost completely surrounded by buoyant orogenic structures. In that context, the mobility of Adria underwent a considerable reduction, whereas uplift and deformation of its southern part was strongly emphasized as an effect of the convergence of the confining plates. Around the middle Pleistocene, the deformation pattern in the peri-Adriatic zones changed again, in response to acceleration of Adria. The outer (Adriatic) sector of the Apennine belt underwent belt-parallel shortening, accommodated by uplift and outward escape of upper crustal wedges. The separation between the extruding wedges and the almost stable inner belt has generated a series of extensional or transtensional fault systems along the axial part of the Apennines, which now correspond to the main seismogenic sources. The spatio-temporal distribution of major tectonic events in the study area can plausibly be explained as an effect of the least-action principle.
2019
Mantovani, E., Viti, M., Babbucci, D., Tamburelli, C., Cenni, N. (2019). How and why the present tectonic setting in the Apennine belt has developed. JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 176(6), 1291-1302 [10.1144/jgs2018-175].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mantovani_JGSL 2019.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 2.55 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.55 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
preprintvitimarcello1070182.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 2.72 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.72 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1070182