Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has a median survival time after diagnosis of 2–5 years. The main goal of treating IPF is to stabilize or reduce the rate of disease progression. Nintedanib and Pirfenidone have been a breakthrough in the management of IPF. Here we evaluated the effectiveness of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib in a population of IPF patients diagnosed in the last 12 months at Florence ILD Referral Centre. Methods: In the last 12 months, 82 IPF patients (66 male, mean age 78.3 ± 23.8 years) were diagnosed and started antifibrotic therapy with Pirfenidone or Nintedanib. Their clinical and functional details were analyzed retrospectively at time 0 and after 6 and 12 months of therapy. Results: The median age of the patients treated with Nintedanib was higher than that of the Pirfenidone group (p < 0.0001). The most common symptoms at disease onset were exertional dyspnoea and dry cough with no differences between the two groups (p < 0.05). All IPF patients manifested bibasal crackles at the time of diagnosis. No significant differences in FVC, FEV1, TLC and DLCO were found at time 0 or after 6 months between patients treated with Pirfenidone and Nintedanib (p > 0.05). After 1 year, lung function test parameters of patients treated with Pirfenidone had remained stable from baseline. Discussion: This study emphasizes that both antifibrotic drugs appeared to be a good therapeutic choice in terms of functional stabilization, also in older patients.
Bargagli, E., Piccioli, C., Rosi, E., Torricelli, E., Turi, L., Piccioli, E., et al. (2019). Pirfenidone and Nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Real-life experience in an Italian referral centre. PULMONOLOGY, 25(3), 149-153 [10.1016/j.pulmoe.2018.06.003].
Pirfenidone and Nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Real-life experience in an Italian referral centre
Bargagli E.;
2019-01-01
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has a median survival time after diagnosis of 2–5 years. The main goal of treating IPF is to stabilize or reduce the rate of disease progression. Nintedanib and Pirfenidone have been a breakthrough in the management of IPF. Here we evaluated the effectiveness of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib in a population of IPF patients diagnosed in the last 12 months at Florence ILD Referral Centre. Methods: In the last 12 months, 82 IPF patients (66 male, mean age 78.3 ± 23.8 years) were diagnosed and started antifibrotic therapy with Pirfenidone or Nintedanib. Their clinical and functional details were analyzed retrospectively at time 0 and after 6 and 12 months of therapy. Results: The median age of the patients treated with Nintedanib was higher than that of the Pirfenidone group (p < 0.0001). The most common symptoms at disease onset were exertional dyspnoea and dry cough with no differences between the two groups (p < 0.05). All IPF patients manifested bibasal crackles at the time of diagnosis. No significant differences in FVC, FEV1, TLC and DLCO were found at time 0 or after 6 months between patients treated with Pirfenidone and Nintedanib (p > 0.05). After 1 year, lung function test parameters of patients treated with Pirfenidone had remained stable from baseline. Discussion: This study emphasizes that both antifibrotic drugs appeared to be a good therapeutic choice in terms of functional stabilization, also in older patients.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
bargagli e pirfenidone pulomonology.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
409.21 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
409.21 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1062454