This paper analyses the case of a local secession, i.e. the birth of a new local jurisdiction by separation from an existing one. We present a stylized model in which society is composed of heterogeneous groups and individuals have an homophily bias. The model predicts that: i) separations, such as the split of a territory into distinct administrative units, occur when the costs of mixed communities are sufficiently large; ii) the smaller community drives the decision to secede; iii) welfare gains from the split are associated with positive population growth; iv) higher payoffs under separations, however, might be related to taste for sameness only, with no (or even negative) effect on economic growth. Empirically, we exploit the secession of the Italian region of Molise from Abruzzo in 1963, a unique event in Italian history. Historical records document that the split was the result of pressures from Molise, the smaller community. Our evidence suggests that the split was associated with population inflows in both areas. Finally, by using a synthetic control approach, we show that the split caused significant benefits to per-capita GDP growth, in both regions.
Dalmazzo, A., DE BLASIO, G., Poy, S. (2018). Local secessions, homophily, and growth. A model with some evidence from the regions of Abruzzo and Molise (Italy,1963). JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 151, 284-306 [10.1016/j.jebo.2018.04.018].
Local secessions, homophily, and growth. A model with some evidence from the regions of Abruzzo and Molise (Italy,1963)
Alberto Dalmazzo;Guido de Blasio;
2018-01-01
Abstract
This paper analyses the case of a local secession, i.e. the birth of a new local jurisdiction by separation from an existing one. We present a stylized model in which society is composed of heterogeneous groups and individuals have an homophily bias. The model predicts that: i) separations, such as the split of a territory into distinct administrative units, occur when the costs of mixed communities are sufficiently large; ii) the smaller community drives the decision to secede; iii) welfare gains from the split are associated with positive population growth; iv) higher payoffs under separations, however, might be related to taste for sameness only, with no (or even negative) effect on economic growth. Empirically, we exploit the secession of the Italian region of Molise from Abruzzo in 1963, a unique event in Italian history. Historical records document that the split was the result of pressures from Molise, the smaller community. Our evidence suggests that the split was associated with population inflows in both areas. Finally, by using a synthetic control approach, we show that the split caused significant benefits to per-capita GDP growth, in both regions.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
JEBO2018.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.89 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.89 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
ADGDBSP_12apr2018_2ndREV PP.pdf
Open Access dal 02/08/2021
Tipologia:
Post-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
462.77 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
462.77 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1058887