Introduction: Although differentiation between benign and malignant small renal tumors (<= 4 cm) is still difficult, it is a demand for decision making and determining the treatment strategy. Our aim is to evaluate the role of multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) in the differentiation of small renal clear cell carcinoma (RCC) and renal oncocytoma (RO).Methods: We reviewed triphasic computed tomographic (CT) scans performed in 43 patients diagnosed with RCC (n = 23) and RO (n = 21). After an unenhanced CT phase of the upper abdomen, triple-phase acquisition included a cortico-medullary phase (CMP), a nephrographic phase (NP), and a pyelographic phase (PP), and lesions were evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively.Results: RCCs were hypervascular in 13 cases and hypovascular in 10 cases, while ROs were hypervascular in nine cases and hypovascular in 12 cases. Mean attenuation values (MAVs) for hypervascular RCCs and hypervascular ROs on unenhanced examination were 34.0 +/- 7.1 and 31.3 +/- 8.1 HU, respectively. Enhancement in CMP was 173.1 +/- 45.2 HU for RCCs and 151.1 +/- 36.0 HU for ROs and a gradual wash-out in NP (148.8 +/- 34.3 and 137.1 +/- 33.9 HU for RCCs and ROs, respectively) and in PP (98.2 +/- 36.0 HU for RCCs and 79.4 +/- 21.5 HU for ROs) was observed. MAV for hypovascular RCCs and hypovascular ROs on unenhanced examination were 32.4 +/- 12.0 and 28.9 +/- 8.0 HU, respectively. Both hypovascular RCCs and ROs showed a statistically significant difference in each post contrastographic phase.Conclusions: Absolute attenuation and the quantitative amount of the enhancement were not strong predictors for RO and RCC differentiation.

Scialpi, M., Martorana, E., Rondoni, V., Eissa, A., Sherbiny, A.E., Bevilacqua, L., et al. (2017). Value of triphasic MDCT in the differentiation of small renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. UROLOGIA, 84(4), 244-250 [10.5301/uj.5000256].

Value of triphasic MDCT in the differentiation of small renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma

Mazzei, Maria Antonietta;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: Although differentiation between benign and malignant small renal tumors (<= 4 cm) is still difficult, it is a demand for decision making and determining the treatment strategy. Our aim is to evaluate the role of multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) in the differentiation of small renal clear cell carcinoma (RCC) and renal oncocytoma (RO).Methods: We reviewed triphasic computed tomographic (CT) scans performed in 43 patients diagnosed with RCC (n = 23) and RO (n = 21). After an unenhanced CT phase of the upper abdomen, triple-phase acquisition included a cortico-medullary phase (CMP), a nephrographic phase (NP), and a pyelographic phase (PP), and lesions were evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively.Results: RCCs were hypervascular in 13 cases and hypovascular in 10 cases, while ROs were hypervascular in nine cases and hypovascular in 12 cases. Mean attenuation values (MAVs) for hypervascular RCCs and hypervascular ROs on unenhanced examination were 34.0 +/- 7.1 and 31.3 +/- 8.1 HU, respectively. Enhancement in CMP was 173.1 +/- 45.2 HU for RCCs and 151.1 +/- 36.0 HU for ROs and a gradual wash-out in NP (148.8 +/- 34.3 and 137.1 +/- 33.9 HU for RCCs and ROs, respectively) and in PP (98.2 +/- 36.0 HU for RCCs and 79.4 +/- 21.5 HU for ROs) was observed. MAV for hypovascular RCCs and hypovascular ROs on unenhanced examination were 32.4 +/- 12.0 and 28.9 +/- 8.0 HU, respectively. Both hypovascular RCCs and ROs showed a statistically significant difference in each post contrastographic phase.Conclusions: Absolute attenuation and the quantitative amount of the enhancement were not strong predictors for RO and RCC differentiation.
2017
Scialpi, M., Martorana, E., Rondoni, V., Eissa, A., Sherbiny, A.E., Bevilacqua, L., et al. (2017). Value of triphasic MDCT in the differentiation of small renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. UROLOGIA, 84(4), 244-250 [10.5301/uj.5000256].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Value of Triphasic MDCT-2017.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: PDF editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 355.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
355.85 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1042119