Purpose – This article investigates the relationships between firm capabilities, business model (BM) design, and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach – The study provides a quantitative assessment of the proposed model using a sample of 411 small- and medium-sized enterprises. Heckman’s sample selection model is employed as an econometric framework. Findings – The outcomes demonstrate that the adoption of a given BM is endogenous with respect to firm capabilities, different capabilities spur the adoption of different BM, and that different business model designs have variable impacts on firm performance. Research limitations/implications – Some investigated variables were operationalized using proxies, and firm performance was measured based on a self-assessed scale. Practical implications – Since different types of capabilities are at the bases of different BM designs that eventually reverberate on firm performance, SMEs should carefully balance their financial resources invested in the development of capabilities. Originality/value – This study represents one of the first attempts to investigate the relationships between firm capabilities, BM design, and firm performance.
Pucci, T., Nosi, C., Zanni, L. (2017). Firm capabilities, business model design and performance of SMEs. JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT, 24(2), 222-241 [10.1108/JSBED-09-2016-0138].
Firm capabilities, business model design and performance of SMEs
Pucci, Tommaso;Nosi, Costanza;Zanni, Lorenzo
2017-01-01
Abstract
Purpose – This article investigates the relationships between firm capabilities, business model (BM) design, and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach – The study provides a quantitative assessment of the proposed model using a sample of 411 small- and medium-sized enterprises. Heckman’s sample selection model is employed as an econometric framework. Findings – The outcomes demonstrate that the adoption of a given BM is endogenous with respect to firm capabilities, different capabilities spur the adoption of different BM, and that different business model designs have variable impacts on firm performance. Research limitations/implications – Some investigated variables were operationalized using proxies, and firm performance was measured based on a self-assessed scale. Practical implications – Since different types of capabilities are at the bases of different BM designs that eventually reverberate on firm performance, SMEs should carefully balance their financial resources invested in the development of capabilities. Originality/value – This study represents one of the first attempts to investigate the relationships between firm capabilities, BM design, and firm performance.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
JSBED - Pucci, Nosi, Zanni, 2017 Pubblicato.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
275.9 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
275.9 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
JSBED, 2017 PP.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Post-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
478.42 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
478.42 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1004764