This contribution starts a critical analysis and reconstruction of arguments in classical texts of Islamic theology (of the period AD 900-1100) from the viewpoint of the epistemological theory of argumentation. The main question of the analysis is whether these arguments can be reconstructed as being of one of the universal types of argument identified so far by the epistemological approach. The answer is: yes – though non-deductive arguments are not yet well elaborated.
Lumer, C., Ince, S. (2015). Islamic Theological Arguments. An Epistemological Systematisation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, July 1-4, 2014 (pp.896-906). Sic Sat.
Islamic Theological Arguments. An Epistemological Systematisation
LUMER, CHRISTOPH;
2015-01-01
Abstract
This contribution starts a critical analysis and reconstruction of arguments in classical texts of Islamic theology (of the period AD 900-1100) from the viewpoint of the epistemological theory of argumentation. The main question of the analysis is whether these arguments can be reconstructed as being of one of the universal types of argument identified so far by the epistemological approach. The answer is: yes – though non-deductive arguments are not yet well elaborated.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
A110_Lumer&Ince_IslamicTheologicalArguments_Print.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
308.1 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
308.1 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/985672