The distinction cause/effect is often linked to the distinction before/after [Michotte, 1946 La Perception de la Causalite ̈ (Louvain: Institut Supe ̈ rieur de Philosophie)]. We run two experi- ments referring to Michotte's launch-effect paradigm, to test the hypothesis that it is possible to perceive a relationship of causation when (I) the second member B of the succession disappears before being touched by the first member A (from 450 ms of anticipation to 366 ms of delay), and when (II), given the simultaneity of the stopping of A and the vanishing of B, B is not in contact with A (from 1 to 70 mm) and it is in different spatial positions. Experimental results show that the perception of causation persists even (i) if B disappears 170 ms before A ceases its motion, and (ii) if the distance between the two squares is about 6 mm. The position of B is not relevant. The conclusions are: (1) an event can be perceived as an effect even when it occurs before the first event, perceived as the cause, finishes; (2) since the event effect is not a motion, there is no room for the Michotte's theory (about perception of causality) of amplification of the movement.
Parovel, G., Sinico, M., Vicario, G.B. (2001). The disappearance effect. In Perception, Suppl. (pp.64-64).
The disappearance effect
PAROVEL, GIULIA;
2001-01-01
Abstract
The distinction cause/effect is often linked to the distinction before/after [Michotte, 1946 La Perception de la Causalite ̈ (Louvain: Institut Supe ̈ rieur de Philosophie)]. We run two experi- ments referring to Michotte's launch-effect paradigm, to test the hypothesis that it is possible to perceive a relationship of causation when (I) the second member B of the succession disappears before being touched by the first member A (from 450 ms of anticipation to 366 ms of delay), and when (II), given the simultaneity of the stopping of A and the vanishing of B, B is not in contact with A (from 1 to 70 mm) and it is in different spatial positions. Experimental results show that the perception of causation persists even (i) if B disappears 170 ms before A ceases its motion, and (ii) if the distance between the two squares is about 6 mm. The position of B is not relevant. The conclusions are: (1) an event can be perceived as an effect even when it occurs before the first event, perceived as the cause, finishes; (2) since the event effect is not a motion, there is no room for the Michotte's theory (about perception of causality) of amplification of the movement.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/21645
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo